Rated Care Homes

Morley Manor Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 9 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 104 of 138

    rated care homes in Leeds are rated Good, like this one.

Morley Manor Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 33 beds, Leeds

Rated Good in November 2025, up from Inadequate.

Morley Manor Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Springfield House Retirement Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Kirklands Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Alexander Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Leeds and Morley Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Ferndale Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Morley

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 November 2025 (assessment visit 1 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Dates of assessment: 14 October 2025 to 30 October 2025. Morley Manor is a 33 bedded residential care home, supporting older people, including people living with dementia. At the time of our assessment there were 26 people living at the service. We visited on 14 October 2025 and 22 October 2025. We carried out this assessment to check the provider had made the required improvements after our last assessment of the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Safe staffing levels were in place and staff had the training and support to carry out their role. Recruitment was managed safely. There was an established staff team who knew people well and fostered caring and trusting relationships. The service had a positive person-centred culture. Risks to people’s health, safety and wellbeing were assessed and regularly reviewed. Some improvements were required in relation to the management of medicines, but we found people were receiving their medication as prescribed.

People’s health needs were met and the service worked well with stakeholders and other agencies. There were strong links with health and social care professionals. The service was homely, safe and well maintained and there was an ongoing refurbishment plan in place.

Audits and checks were in place to maintain oversight of the service. Governance arrangements had recently been strengthened through more enhanced monitoring and the recruitment of a deputy manager to support the registered manager. The provider and registered manager were accessible and approachable and committed to providing a person-centred, high-quality service.

The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to good governance, the management of risk and medicines, and staff training. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of legal regulations. We found the overall quality of the service had improved and the rating had changed from requires improvement to good.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kerry Jordan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

13 inspection reports, latest 4 July 2023. Latest assessment published 25 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04652611 (opens Companies House)

W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited

  1. RI
    Stone Gables Care Home Requires improvement. Care home, Leeds

Getting help from Leeds City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Morley Manor Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Morley Manor Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Morley Manor Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 33 beds at Morley Manor Residential Home.
When was Morley Manor Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Morley Manor Residential Home was published on 25 November 2025.
Who runs Morley Manor Residential Home?
Morley Manor Residential Home is run by W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited. It runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Morley Manor Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 25 November 2025.

Contact

Address
Brunswick Street, Morley, Leeds, LS27 9DL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Springfield House Retirement Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Kirklands Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Alexander Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Leeds and Morley Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Ferndale Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Morley