Rated Care Homes

Futures

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 214 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Futures: inspection record

Care home, 21 beds, East Sussex

Rated Good in May 2026.

Futures: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Nightingales Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 1.9 miles away
  2. –
    Walstead Place Care Home Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away
  3. G
    128 Beech Hill Good, 2.7 miles away
  4. G
    Magnolia House Good, 2.7 miles away
  5. RI
    St Clare's Care Home Requires improvement, 3.3 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 May 2026 (assessment visit 20 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Overall service commentary (2000)

Futures is a care home which consists of 3 bungalows located on the site of Chailey Heritage Foundation. The provider, Chailey Heritage Foundation, is a registered charity that supports children and young adults with complex physical and learning disabilities. Futures is registered to support up to 21 people. They support people between the ages of 16 and 25. At the time of inspection there were 16 people being supported.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We undertook this comprehensive assessment due to the length of time since our last visit. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service was fully compliant with these principles. There was a registered manager in place who had been at the home for 11 years.

The provider liaised with other healthcare professionals to provide continuity of care and treatment, this ensured people had safe transitions and pathways of care if moving between different services. Although the service is not registered to provide nursing care, people had access to clinical services on site which allowed for a range of specialist clinicians and therapists to assist them when needed; this included 24-hour support from an NHS nursing team. Environmental risks were well managed, and safety checks were completed as required. There was an established recruitment process in place and the registered manager ensured there were enough staff to safely support people. Staff completed a variety of training courses and visual competencies prior to starting work, allowing them to deliver care with confidence and developed a range of skills, including supporting people requiring clinical interventions.

People received their medicines safely as prescribed. Staff could consult with the clinical services team for advice and guidance on medicines or people’s care. People’s independence was encouraged, and people were supported to make simple decisions about their daily routines.People were assisted to lead full and busy lives with a range of activities and outings being offered. Opportunities to go on holidays with their peers, or families, were facilitated for people, with the required staffing support in place. A quality assurance team provided a high level of oversight, and regularly monitored and evaluated any risks, incidents and accidents. Clear feedback pathways were evident with regular team meetings, and attention was given to learning and improving the service. The home provided regular feedback opportunities for staff and families and acted to implement positive change when necessary. The service promoted a culture of openness and transparency and had a welcoming friendly atmosphere. The provider had all required policies in place, and these had been regularly reviewed.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant services were tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ella Gallop
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 10 May 2018. Latest assessment published 26 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03769775 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1075837

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Futures provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Futures as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Futures have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 21 beds at Futures.
When was Futures last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Futures was published on 26 May 2026.
Who runs Futures?
Futures is run by Chailey Heritage Foundation.
What is Futures's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01825 724444
Address
Haywards Heath Road, North Chailey, Lewes, BN8 4EF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Nightingales Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 1.9 miles away
  2. –
    Walstead Place Care Home Not yet rated, 2.7 miles away
  3. G
    128 Beech Hill Good, 2.7 miles away
  4. G
    Magnolia House Good, 2.7 miles away
  5. RI
    St Clare's Care Home Requires improvement, 3.3 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex