Rated Care Homes

Lychgate House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 295 of 361

    rated care homes in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

Lychgate House: inspection record

Care home, 16 beds, Essex

Rated Good in August 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Lychgate House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Hilton House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Millwrights Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. –
    Care Givers Limited Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    26 Dugard Avenue Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Lexden

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 August 2026 (assessment visit 10 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We inspected Lychgate House from 21 July to 4 August 2026. Lychgate House is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 16 people. The service provides support to people who have mental health needs. At the time of our inspection there were 16 people using the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

In May 2023 the provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding and governance of the service. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

The provider had systems and processes in place to assess and manage risks to people’s health, safety and wellbeing. Staff received training, supervision and support to carry out their roles effectively, and recruitment records demonstrated appropriate pre-employment checks had been completed. Medicines were managed safely through established procedures, with regular audits undertaken to monitor practice and identify opportunities for improvement.

The general environment had improved with the addition of a new orangery which increased the amount of communal space people could access. Systems to ensure equipment was serviced within time frames were in place and upgrades to the fire system had started with some works left to do, however timescales for completion were in place. Infection control processes had improved with the support of routine audits, environmental checks and ongoing oversight of cleanliness and safety standards.

People’s needs were regularly assessed and reviewed to ensure their care reflected their individual circumstances, preferences and requirements. Staff worked collaboratively with healthcare professionals and other agencies to promote and maintain people’s health and wellbeing. Staff sought people’s consent before providing care and assessed their capacity to make specific decisions when required. Where people lacked capacity, decisions were made lawfully and in line with best-interest principles.

Most people and their relatives were positive about opportunities to access the community and take part in activities and events. People had activity plans in place to support their interests and preferences. People and relatives consistently told us communication was good and they were kept informed about changes to care and support.

Staff were mindful of supporting and promoting people’s independence and respected people’s privacy.

Governance systems had improved and were more effective in monitoring the quality and safety of the service, helping to identify areas for improvement and support positive outcomes for people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Alida-Vallee Govinden
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 31 May 2023. Latest assessment published 17 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12825553 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Lychgate House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Lychgate House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Lychgate House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 16 beds at Lychgate House.
When was Lychgate House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lychgate House was published on 17 August 2026.
Who runs Lychgate House?
Lychgate House is run by Lychgate House Care Limited.
What is Lychgate House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01206 500074
Address
145 Shrub End Road, Colchester, CO3 4RE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Hilton House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Millwrights Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. –
    Care Givers Limited Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    26 Dugard Avenue Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Lexden