Rated Care Homes

Figtree Care Services Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Rated Requires improvement at every inspection since 2016.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 35 of 212

    rated home care services in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Figtree Care Services Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Kent

Rated Requires improvement in January 2020.

Figtree Care Services Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bethal Manna Care Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Chameleon Care (Dartford) (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Banner House Support Services Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bethal Manna Care Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Chameleon Care (Dartford) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    LANH No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Retons Care and Training Services Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Kent

See all home care services in Dartford Marshes

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 18 January 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Figtree Care services Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. Approximately 21 people were receiving personal care in their own homes at the time of inspection. Most people receiving care and support needed two staff to provide their care at each visit. People had varying needs, some had physical difficulties with their mobility, some had received treatment in hospital for serious health conditions and others had long term health conditions.

What inspectors found

The service people received was not always safe. The administration of people's medicines was safer, however, staff did not always keep accurate records, for those who needed staff assistance to take their medicines. Individual risk assessments were in place but plans to manage the risk and prevent harm were not always recorded. Staff recruitment continued to need further improvement to make sure only suitable staff were employed to provide people's care.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff now had opportunities to increase their skills and confidence through better training, improving the care people received, however, some induction and refresher training was not carried out in a timely way.

Although the provider had made improvements to their monitoring processes, these required more development to make sure people received a service that was safe, of good quality and could be continued. The provider had carried out a satisfaction survey with people and had analysed the results. However, they had not shared this with people and their relatives.

Other elements of care had improved. People told us they felt safe with staff and were confident in their care. People said they felt there were enough staff as their care was rarely cancelled and staff stayed the full length of time when visiting. However, staff sometimes recorded shorter visits than had been agreed. We have made a recommendation about this.

Accidents and incidents were recorded by staff, but a mechanism was not in place to learn lessons from incidents, so improvements could be made to people's care. People said they felt safe in the with staff and they were clear who they could go to if they had any concerns.

Assessments were carried out with people before they started to use the service to make sure their needs could be met. People were supported to access healthcare advice and given assistance with their nutrition and hydration when this was needed. People and their relatives told us they were involved in and directed their care, making their own choices and decisions.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the

least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People and their relatives were positive about the staff supporting them, saying staff respected them and describing them as caring and kind.

Care plans provided better information and were updated when people's needs changed. People had the information they needed to make a complaint if they needed to, However, the provider and registered manager did not always follow their procedures by keeping complainants fully informed of the progress and outcome of their complaint. We have made a recommendation about this. People's end of life care plans needed to be developed further to make sure people's wishes were recorded for staff to follow.

We received only positive comments about the staff, the registered manager and the office staff from people and their relatives, which was an improvement on the feedback received at the last inspection. People thought the service was well managed.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 18 January 2020. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 18 January 2020. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 18 January 2020. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 January 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Munyaradzi Charuma
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 18 January 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08560375 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Figtree Care Services Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Figtree Care Services Ltd.
When was Figtree Care Services Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Figtree Care Services Ltd was published on 18 January 2020.
Who runs Figtree Care Services Ltd?
Figtree Care Services Ltd is run by Figtree Care Services Ltd.
What is Figtree Care Services Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 18 January 2020.

Contact

Phone
01322 314878
Address
Suite 15, The Base, Dartford Business Park, Victoria Road, Dartford, DA1 5FS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bethal Manna Care Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Chameleon Care (Dartford) (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Banner House Support Services Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bethal Manna Care Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Chameleon Care (Dartford) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    LANH No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Retons Care and Training Services Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Kent

See all home care services in Dartford Marshes