Rated Care Homes

B24 Healthcare Solution Limited

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Requires improvement at every inspection since 2023.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 85%

    of rated home care services in Warwickshire are Good or Outstanding (82% across the West Midlands, 88% across England).

B24 Healthcare Solution Limited: inspection record

Home care, Warwickshire

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

B24 Healthcare Solution Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: People in Action Domiciliary Care - Warwickshire and Coventry (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Almond Care Limited (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Almond Care Limited Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. –
    Eliot Park Innovation Centre Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  4. RI
    Exceptional Care Services Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  5. RI
    Honeydew Healthcare Limited Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Bermuda

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 February 2026 (assessment visit 1 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 7 to 9 January 2026

B24 Healthcare Solution Limited is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of our inspection the service provided packages of care to 85 people, of which 84 received the regulated activity of personal care. The service was registered to provide support to older people, younger adults, people living with a diagnosis of dementia, people with a learning disability and people on the autistic spectrum and people with a physical disability. At the time of our inspection, people in receipt of a service were older people and younger adults. No service was provided to anyone with a learning disability or persons on the autistic spectrum. The service was also registered to provide supported living. The service was not providing this support at the time of our inspection; therefore, we did not assess it.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (report published 16 January 2024). We identified 2 breaches of the regulations related to safe care and treatment and good governance. We requested an action plan from the provider to tell us how they intended to make the required improvements. We undertook this inspection to check they had followed their action plan. We found sufficient improvement had been made in safe care and treatment and the provider was no longer in breach. Whilst we found improvements in governance this was not sufficient, and we found the provider remained in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance. This was the third consecutive inspection where the provider had not met this legal regulation.

Staff carried out some checks on the quality and safety of the service. However, there was limited oversight from the provider to ensure checks drove effective improvements. Some checks did not identify the concerns we found during the inspection.

Medicines were not always safely managed to ensure manufacturer’s directions were followed. Medicine administration records were in place, but other important records; body maps for the safe administration of transdermal (skin) patches were not.

Staff received safeguarding training and understood their role in protecting people from abuse. Overall, the provider understood their role in making safeguarding referrals and working with other agencies. The provider had not, however, implemented their own policy related to staff handling people’s money.

Care planning documentation was personalised and contained most of the information staff needed to care for and support people. Risk assessments were in place and most risk mitigation gave staff the details they needed to keep people safe from avoidable harm.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance. Sufficient improvements were not found at this inspection and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2024. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2024. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2024. Ask how staff protect dignity and how people are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2024. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.

Registration details

Registered manager
Nicola Kanye
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 16 January 2024. Latest assessment published 10 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12571983 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does B24 Healthcare Solution Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for B24 Healthcare Solution Limited.
When was B24 Healthcare Solution Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for B24 Healthcare Solution Limited was published on 10 February 2026.
Who runs B24 Healthcare Solution Limited?
B24 Healthcare Solution Limited is run by B24 Healthcare Solution Limited.
What is B24 Healthcare Solution Limited's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Address
Unit 1 BIC, Bermuda Innovation Centre, St. Davids Way, Nuneaton, CV10 7SD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: People in Action Domiciliary Care - Warwickshire and Coventry (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Almond Care Limited (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Almond Care Limited Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. –
    Eliot Park Innovation Centre Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  4. RI
    Exceptional Care Services Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  5. RI
    Honeydew Healthcare Limited Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Bermuda