Pro Healthcare Services
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2021
- Kirkstall, Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
At a glance
2 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Requires improvement to Inadequate.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
83%
of rated home care services in Leeds are Good or Outstanding (90% across Yorkshire and the Humber, 88% across England).
Pro Healthcare Services: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Classic Health Care Solutions-Leeds (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Leeds (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Classic Health Care Solutions-Leeds Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Leeds Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- – Main Site No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Nefid Personnel Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Quodesh Healthcare Consultancy Ltd Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 July 2026 (assessment visit 1 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 10 and 30 June 2026. Pro Healthcare Services is a care at home service providing support to adults, in the areas of Leeds, Wakefield and York. At the time of assessment, the service was supporting 30 people. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do; we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment 18 people were receiving support with personal care. We reviewed all quality statements.
- Safe Inadequate
- Effective No rating
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We carried out this assessment due to concerns we received regarding staffing and management at the service. Theproviderwas previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and theproviderremained in breach of this regulation. During this assessment, we identified 2 additional breaches relating to person centred care and safe care during this assessment.
We continued to find a lack of effective management and oversight at the service. The provider failed to implement effective processes to monitor and improve the quality of the service and identify the issues found during our assessment. Records were not always complete or contemporaneous. Management were not always following the regulations, best practice guidance or their own policies and procedures.
Overall, people did not always receive safe, effective or person-centred care. Risks were not well managed. Systems to monitor safety, including incidents, safeguarding and medicines, were not effective. People did not always receive their care visits at the scheduled times and staff did not always stay for the full duration of the care visits; people and relatives told us about the negative impact this had on them. We completed a safeguarding referral in relation to these concerns.
There was a lack of evidence that catheter care was always completed safely. Overall, recruitment was managed well. Infection prevention and control practices were embedded, and staff understood how to manage risks of infection.
A review of training records identified gaps in some mandatory training and competency assessments; however, updated information and supporting evidence provided by the service demonstrated that essential training had been completed or was in progress, with examples of competency assessments available for staff sampled.
Quality assurance, learning and governance systems had not been effective in identifying or addressing these issues prior to our assessment. We found improvements were required to ensure the service delivered was safe and effective for people.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
Inadequate
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the ways people’s medicines were managed safely.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to lack of person centred care.
-
Well-led
Inadequate
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.
Questions to ask the service
- Safe was rated Inadequate on 28 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Inadequate on 28 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Agness Muvavarirwa
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 29 March 2023. Latest assessment published 28 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Pro Healthcare Services Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 12187973 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Leeds City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Leeds City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0113 222 4401, weekdays 9am to 5pm (Wednesdays from 10am)
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Leeds City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Pro Healthcare Services provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Pro Healthcare Services.
- When was Pro Healthcare Services last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Pro Healthcare Services was published on 28 July 2026.
- Who runs Pro Healthcare Services?
- Pro Healthcare Services is run by Pro Healthcare Services Limited.
- What is Pro Healthcare Services's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Contact
- Phone
- 0113 824 2503
- Address
- Unit 20, Burley Hill Business Centre, Burley Hill Trading Estate, Leeds, LS4 2PU Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Classic Health Care Solutions-Leeds (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Leeds (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Classic Health Care Solutions-Leeds Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Leeds Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- – Main Site No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Nefid Personnel Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Quodesh Healthcare Consultancy Ltd Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away