Rated Care Homes

Hasz Homecare Services

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 125 of 138

    rated home care services in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Hasz Homecare Services: inspection record

Home care, West Sussex

Rated Good in March 2023.

Hasz Homecare Services: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    DBAGZ Solutions Limited Crawley Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    RMJPI Dignity Care Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Southood Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Southern Counties Caring Ltd Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    AAT Quality Care Agency Ltd No overall rating, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in West Sussex

See all home care services in Three Bridges

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 10 March 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Hasz Homecare Services is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes with age related frailties or physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 4 people using the service. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

People's health related risks were not always assessed and mitigated. Where people lived with health conditions, care plans did not always contain enough detail to guide staff on signs to monitor potential health deterioration. Where people required support to move and position, care plans did not always include enough information for staff.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff were not always recruited safely; the registered manager did not always ensure staff had current Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks and relied on checks from previous employment. Other checks, such as, references and rights to work were undertaken. The registered manager applied for new DBS checks during our inspection.

People were kept safe from the risk of infection, staff received infection control training and had appropriate personal protective equipment. Staff supported people with medicines safely, they were trained and assessed as competent before being permitted to administer medicines to people.

People told us they felt safe, they knew who to speak with if they had any problems. Staff were aware of their safeguarding responsibilities and knew how and where to report concerns.

People were supported by enough staff who knew them well and were trained to meet their needs. Staff completed an induction period which included shadowing an experienced member of staff. One staff member told us, "I got all the required training which gave me confidence to carry out my role. For the first 3 weeks I got 100% support with shadowing which helped me with real time training." One person said, "I find the staff lovely, all of them. I think they are well trained."

People told us staff asked permission before offering support. One person told us, "They have my permission to help." Staff told us they always checked for consent before supporting people. Staff had received Mental Capacity Act (MCA) training and understood the principles of supporting people in the least restrictive way.

People lived independent lives and were supported by caring staff who upheld their dignity and autonomy. Staff provided care so people could remain in control of their lives. People told us staff spent time to get to know them. One person said, "They stay for the right amount of time. Up until now it's mostly the same person, I like to get to know the carers and have a laugh."

People received care personalised to their needs and contributed to their care plans. The registered manager ensured documentation was produced to meet people's communication needs.

People knew the registered manager and were happy with their leadership style. Staff spoke highly of the management team, and said they were able to contact them when required. Comments included, "We have spot checks and my manager calls me to check I am ok, and it feels like I am being looked after as well." And, "The management is very helpful, cooperative and good listeners."

Quality assurance processes were effective and there was a clear plan for the future of the service. The management team were keen to develop the service and continually improve care.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 10 March 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Hasifa Nampijja
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 10 March 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11932076 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hasz Homecare Services provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Hasz Homecare Services.
When was Hasz Homecare Services last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hasz Homecare Services was published on 10 March 2023.
Who runs Hasz Homecare Services?
Hasz Homecare Services is run by Hasz Recruitment Solutions Ltd.
What is Hasz Homecare Services's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 10 March 2023.

Contact

Phone
01444 390803
Address
Unit 13, Crawley Business Centre, Stephenson Way, Three Bridges, Crawley, RH10 1TN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    DBAGZ Solutions Limited Crawley Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    RMJPI Dignity Care Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Southood Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Southern Counties Caring Ltd Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    AAT Quality Care Agency Ltd No overall rating, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in West Sussex

See all home care services in Three Bridges