Rated Care Homes

Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 13 of 85

    rated home care services in Warwickshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Warwickshire

Rated Requires improvement in April 2026.

Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Manor Court Chambers (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Cornerstone Authentic Care Ltd (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Manor Court Chambers Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Cornerstone Authentic Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. –
    Applewood Support Limited No overall rating, 0.8 miles away
  4. –
    Angel and Star Care Services Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Phoenix Gold Homecare Main Office Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Nuneaton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 April 2026 (assessment visit 19 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Greenmore Healthcare Services Limited is a domicillary care agency which is registered to provide personal care and support to people in their own homes. The service is registered to provide support to younger and older adults, people living with dementia, mental health issues, people who misuse drugs and alcohol, people with a sensory impairment and / or physical disability and people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our assessment the service supported 6 people and 5 were in receipt of the regulated activity of personal care.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of our inspection, the service was supporting people with specific needs linked to a learning disability or autism, but they were not in receipt of a regulated activity. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as the service is registered as a specialist service for this population group. We found some improvements were needed for the provider to meet the principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ and these are reported on within our full report.

This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. We found 3 breaches of regulation related to safe care and treatment, safe recruitment of staff and governance of the service.

Systems and processes had not been developed to monitor and improve the safety and quality of the service. The provider was not yet familiar with the regulations. We found numerous omissions in documents we expected to be in place to ensure the safety of the service. This included medication administration records, body maps and medicine protocols to support staff in the safe handling of medicines. Some risk management plans were not in place and staff did not always have the information to refer to when needed.

We identified 3 safeguarding incidents that had not been reported to us as legally required because the provider had not been aware of the requirement to do this. However, some actions had been taken by the provider to act on the information of concern.

Safe staff recruitment did not always take place because pre-employment checks were not always completed. We could not be assured staff had always completed all of the training they needed, and the provider had not assured themselves of staff’s skills, as no competency checks had been undertaken.

Despite the concerns we identified, we received positive feedback from people, relatives and staff. There was strong evidence of a supportive provider who valued their staff team, worked alongside them and had a caring hands-on approach toward people and their relatives.

The provider welcomed our feedback and took some immediate actions to make improvement. This included putting medication administration records into place.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns we found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, the ways people’s medicines were managed and safe recruitment of staff.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance of the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 13 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 13 April 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how people are involved in decisions about their care.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 13 April 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Cyprian Katumba
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12476096 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd.
When was Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd was published on 13 April 2026.
Who runs Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd?
Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd is run by Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd.
What is Greenmore Healthcare Services Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 13 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
07888 748760
Address
38 Stainforth Close, Nuneaton, CV11 6WF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Manor Court Chambers (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Cornerstone Authentic Care Ltd (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Manor Court Chambers Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Cornerstone Authentic Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. –
    Applewood Support Limited No overall rating, 0.8 miles away
  4. –
    Angel and Star Care Services Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Phoenix Gold Homecare Main Office Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Nuneaton