Rated Care Homes

Enable Ability

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 18 of 27

    rated home care services in Portsmouth are rated Good, like this one.

Enable Ability: inspection record

Home care, Portsmouth

Rated Good in September 2018, up from Requires improvement.

Enable Ability: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Careville Limited-Hampshire Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Trustmark Care Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Handle With Care Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
  5. O
    Home Instead Portsmouth Outstanding, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in Portsmouth

See all home care services in Milton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 19 September 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This inspection took place on 28 August 2018 and was announced. Enable Ability is a registered charity that provides a range of 11 services to both children and adults with a disability in Portsmouth and the surrounding area, including for example, play schemes, Saturday clubs, groups for teenagers and advocacy. One of the many services they offer are befriending services to both children and adults with learning disabilities, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The service is registered for personal care, which means care provided to a person in the place where the person lives. Although the primary purpose of the befriending services is not the provision of personal care and most activities take place outside of people's homes, some children or adults may on occasions during their session require either the practical provision of, or the supervision of their personal care whilst at home. At the time of this inspection, the befriending services were supporting 30 adults and 38 children, of whom 20 adults and 16 children received on occasions personal care at home if this was required during their session.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

There was a registered manager in post as required. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At our last inspection we found one breach of the regulations in relation to requirements for workers. Following the last inspection, we asked the provider to complete an action plan to show what they would do and by when to improve the key question of safe to at least good. At this inspection we found the required action had been taken to meet this regulation. The provider operated robust recruitment processes.

Processes were in place to protect people from the risk of abuse and risks to people had been assessed. Staff spoken with had a clear understanding of their responsibility to raise any concerns or issues. Processes were in place to ensure trained staff provided people's medicines where required. The provider had acted to ensure the medicine administration records for the one person they currently support with medicines are returned to the office for storage once complete. Processes were in place to protect people from the risk of acquiring an infection.

People's care needs had been assessed prior to the commencement of the service and staff were provided with relevant information both within their training and staff handbooks. Staff underwent training that was specifically tailored to the needs of the person or people they befriended. Staff were not generally involved in the provision of or preparation of food for people at home, however where they did provide this care, this was stated in the person's care plan. Staff supported people when out as required with eating their meals.

Staff worked well across the provider's services to ensure people experienced a seamless and joined up service. The service was not commissioned to meet people's day to day health and well-being needs. However, staff worked closely with a range of agencies to ensure people received effective care and ensured any relevant information was shared. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their

lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Sessional workers had created meaningful relationships with both children and adults who trusted them and enjoyed spending time with them. Staff used a variety of techniques and communication methods to enable people to express their views about their care. Staff ensured people's privacy and dignity were upheld.

The service was very responsive to people's individual needs and the provision of people's befriending sessions were highly personalised. People's aspirations were identified with them and staff supported people to achieve their identified goals. Staff enabled people to have presence in their local community and to maintain relationships. Processes were in place to enable people and their representatives to raise any issues and appropriate action had been taken in response to any issues raised.

There was a clear strategy for the delivery of the service and processes were in place to monitor the culture of the service. The registered manager understood their legal responsibilities and the challenges facing the service. People, their representatives, staff and trustees were all involved in the service and their thoughts and expertise were actively sought and utilised for people's benefit. Internal and external processes were in place to monitor the quality of the service. The service worked in partnership with a variety of agencies to support care provision.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Richard Soutar
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 19 September 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
01405937 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
276422

Getting help from Portsmouth City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Enable Ability provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Enable Ability.
When was Enable Ability last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Enable Ability was published on 19 September 2018.
Who runs Enable Ability?
Enable Ability is run by Enableability.
What is Enable Ability's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 September 2018.