Alexandra House - Bury
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Central Bury, Bury, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
5 months
since the latest rating was published.
30 of 33
rated home care services in Bury are rated Good, like this one.
Alexandra House - Bury: inspection record
Rated Good in May 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Bluebird Care Bury and Bolton Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Helping Hands Bury Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Zenith Health Care Northwest Good, 0.1 miles away
- – P & A Partnership Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G KV Care Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 May 2026 (assessment visit 20 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 01 April to 13 April 2026.
Alexandra House – Bury, trading as Complete Care NW Limited, is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and/or support with eating and drinking. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment the service supported 44 people with personal care.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. Staff promoted people’s independence, so people knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care, support and wellbeing. This helped enable people to remain in their own homes where possible. The provider supported staff wellbeing, which enabled staff to deliver caring, person‑centred support. Staff described feeling valued and well‑supported by management.
There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Before people started using the service their needs were assessed. Staff and teams worked together both internally and with external agencies. This was confirmed by the positive feedback we received from professionals who worked with the service.
There was a clear learning culture within the service, based on openness, honesty and transparency. People were involved in managing risk with new and emerging risks responded to timely. Systems and processes for managing accidents, incidents and untoward events were managed effectively. Systems and process to ensure safe management of medicines were in place and operated effectively. Staff were trained and were assessed as competent to administer medicines safely.
Consent to provide care was obtained by staff. Where appropriate, people were supported to access GP and primary care services.
Systems and processes for audit, quality assurance and questioning of practice. This included regular spot checks with staff around quality and safety. Feedback from people was obtained by the service and valued by the registered manager. People were kept up to date about developments and improvements via regular informative newsletters from the service.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Suzannah Woods
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 26 March 2019. Latest assessment published 26 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Complete Care NW Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 06054040 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Bury Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Bury Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0161 253 5151, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 9am to 5pm, Wednesday 10am to 5pm. Out of hours: 0161 253 6606
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Alexandra House - Bury provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Alexandra House - Bury.
- When was Alexandra House - Bury last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Alexandra House - Bury was published on 26 May 2026.
- Who runs Alexandra House - Bury?
- Alexandra House - Bury is run by Complete Care NW Limited.
- What is Alexandra House - Bury's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 May 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0161 761 1628
- Address
- Suite 8C, Imperial House, 79-81 Hornby Street, Bury, BL9 5BN Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Bluebird Care Bury and Bolton Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Helping Hands Bury Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Zenith Health Care Northwest Good, 0.1 miles away
- – P & A Partnership Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G KV Care Limited Good, 0.3 miles away