Time4Care LTD
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2022
- Grantham, Lincolnshire, East Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
1 month
since the latest rating was published.
61 of 76
rated home care services in Lincolnshire are rated Good, like this one.
Time4Care LTD: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Oaksfield Care Ltd No overall rating, 1.3 miles away
- G Greenwood Homecare Grantham Good, 1.3 miles away
- G The Serenity Community Hub Good, 1.3 miles away
- – Twinic Ltd Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
- G North Division Domiciliary Care Branch Good, 1.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 September 2026 (assessment visit 18 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
The assessment was carried out between 26 July 2026 and 4 September 2026. Time4Care Ltd is a small domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of our assessment, four people were receiving a regulated activity.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This was the provider's first assessment. We looked at all the quality statements across the five key questions of Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well Led.
During this assessment, we identified areas where improvements were needed. These included strengthening medicines recording and auditing processes, ensuring risk assessments were reviewed in line with the provider's policy, improving the availability of local safeguarding information, strengthening recruitment records, and further developing governance and quality assurance systems. Although these issues had not resulted in harm to people, they had not always been identified through the provider's existing monitoring arrangements.
People told us they were happy with the care they received and positive feedback had been received about the service. Staff supported people in a kind, respectful and person-centred way, promoting their independence and involving them in decisions about their care. People's needs were assessed before care started, and staff worked with healthcare professionals and other agencies to help ensure people received coordinated and responsive care.
Staff received training appropriate to their roles and demonstrated a good understanding of people's needs, risks and preferences. The registered manager was visible and actively involved in the day-to-day running of the service. Staff spoke positively about the support they received and described an open culture where they felt able to raise concerns and seek guidance when needed.
The provider was open to feedback throughout the assessment and had already identified actions to strengthen governance arrangements, improve auditing processes, introduce surveys and further develop systems for gathering feedback from people and staff.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.
Requires improvement: This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
Good: This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
Good: This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered required service. This key question has been rated good.
Good: This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.
Good: This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 September 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Joshua Tomlinson
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Time4Care LTD
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 13669077 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Lincolnshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Lincolnshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01522 782155
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Lincolnshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Time4Care LTD provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Time4Care LTD.
- When was Time4Care LTD last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Time4Care LTD was published on 16 September 2026.
- Who runs Time4Care LTD?
- Time4Care LTD is run by Time4Care LTD.
- What is Time4Care LTD's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 September 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 07583 985458
- Address
- 36 Sunningdale, Grantham, NG31 9PF Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Oaksfield Care Ltd No overall rating, 1.3 miles away
- G Greenwood Homecare Grantham Good, 1.3 miles away
- G The Serenity Community Hub Good, 1.3 miles away
- – Twinic Ltd Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
- G North Division Domiciliary Care Branch Good, 1.4 miles away