Rated Care Homes

Hales Group Limited - Waveney

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 89%

    of rated home care services in Suffolk are Good or Outstanding (86% across the East of England, 88% across England).

Hales Group Limited - Waveney: inspection record

Home care, Suffolk

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Hales Group Limited - Waveney: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Waveney Home First (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Caring Moments Limited (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Waveney Home First Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Kingsley Home Care Services Limited Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Anchor Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Voyage (DCA) Complex Community Care Norfolk Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Caring Moments Limited Good, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Suffolk

See all home care services in Lowestoft

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 May 2026 (assessment visit 20 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Inspection:3 March to 27 March 2026.Hales Group Limited – Waveney is a domiciliary care agency supporting people in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received the regulated activity personal care. CQC only assesses where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time of the inspection 31 people were being supported with the regulated activity of personal care. This was our first assessment of this service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was supporting 1 person with a learning disability. As they were not receiving the regulated activity of personal care, we did not review their care records, however, the registered manager demonstrated they had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’, and was able to describe how this guidance was implemented in line with people’s care needs.

There were systems in place to assess risks to people and ways to reduce them, but the quality of risk assessments varied, with some risks being very well detailed whilst others were not. Records did not always describe people’s needs and how staff would support them. This was important as there were new staff working at the service who required accurate guidance to enable them to provide care which was effective and safe. The registered manager who started in post in September 2025, had already identified the need for improvement in risk assessments. Additional digital tasks were added to the information seen by staff on a daily basis so they understood the risk to people. This included risks such as diabetes, falls, choking, and skin integrity. This action reduced the risk of harm whilst risk assessments were being updated.

Safeguarding concerns about people using the service were reported to the local authority safeguarding team, however, the provider had not always submitted statutory notifications to CQC as required. People told us they always received their visits by care staff, but some experienced a delay in care staff arrival times. Some people felt the newer staff needed additional training, and better consistency of staff visiting them so they could build trust. The registered manager was monitoring this weekly to try and improve people’s experience. Governance systems were in place which identified where improvements were needed. This included audits of medicines records, care records and the quality of documentation. Improvements were made as a result of the audits being undertaken, for example, the quality of recording in medicines records and daily notes. Where improvements had been identified, additional training was implemented, such as record keeping workshops and medicines refresher training.

People were supported to stay healthy and to access external healthcare services.

During and following the inspection, the registered manager and regional manager took action to begin rectifying areas which required improvement.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Requires Improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kelly-Marie Mildren
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Extra Care housing services, Supported living service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Hales Group LimitedBrand: Hales Group Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03756814 (opens Companies House)

Hales Group Limited runs 23 services in England, 9 of them in the East of England. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 14 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Hales Group Limited

  1. G
    Hales Group Limited - Grimsby Good. Home care, North East Lincolnshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. G
    Hales Group Limited - Hull Good. Home care, Hull, Yorkshire and the Humber
  3. G
    Hales Group Limited - Peterborough Good. Home care, Peterborough
  4. G
    Hales Group Limited - Rotherham Good. Home care, Rotherham, Yorkshire and the Humber

See all 23 services run by Hales Group Limited

Getting help from Suffolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hales Group Limited - Waveney provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Hales Group Limited - Waveney.
When was Hales Group Limited - Waveney last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hales Group Limited - Waveney was published on 19 May 2026.
Who runs Hales Group Limited - Waveney?
Hales Group Limited - Waveney is run by Hales Group Limited. It runs 23 services in England, 9 of them in the East of England.
What is Hales Group Limited - Waveney's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Address
Jarrold House, Grove Road, Lowestoft, NR32 1EB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Waveney Home First (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Caring Moments Limited (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Waveney Home First Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Kingsley Home Care Services Limited Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Anchor Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Voyage (DCA) Complex Community Care Norfolk Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Caring Moments Limited Good, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Suffolk

See all home care services in Lowestoft