Rated Care Homes

Dana Home Care

Home care, Barnet

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Dana Home Care: inspection record

Home care, Barnet

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Dana Home Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 4 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016, then Requires improvement in 2018, then Good in 2019 and August 2026.

The latest rating was published 2 months ago.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 August 2026 (assessment visit 28 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this assessment from 25 June to 7 July 2026. The service is a care at home service providing personal care to people living in supported living settings. At the time of the assessment, the service supported approximately 23 people across multiple supported living properties, 13 of whom received the regulated activity of personal care. People lived in shared houses or individual flats and received care tailored to their needs from staff deployed within each service.

The service supports people with a learning disability and autistic people, as well as people with mental health needs and associated physical health conditions, who are living in their own homes. Many people required support with communication, managing distress and anxiety, and managing health needs, including multiple or changing conditions.

Read the full summary

Care is delivered within a supported living model, where people's tenancy agreements are separate from their care arrangements. Staff are based within or allocated to specific services, which helps promote continuity of care and build consistent relationships.

The service provides person-centred care based on the principles of positive behaviour support and active support. People are supported to develop independence, maintain routines, and engage in activities in their local communities, including education, day services and social opportunities. Care is tailored to reflect people’s communication needs, preferences and life history, using visual aids, structured routines and personalised support approaches.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We found staff worked in line with the MCA and applied restrictions proportionately. Where restrictions were in place, staff recorded clear decisions and involved families or advocates. People were not subject to unnecessary restrictions and were supported to maintain choice and control over their daily lives.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

People were supported by staff who recognised risks and responded appropriately. Staff described clear processes for identifying and escalating concerns, including seeking medical support and involving external professionals. Safeguarding systems were understood and applied consistently. Staffing levels were sufficient, and rotas showed continuity of staff, which supported consistent care delivery. Medicines were managed safely, and staff followed clear processes when administering and recording medicines.

Staff assessed support needs and delivered care based on evidence. Staff monitored changes in people’s health and wellbeing and sought advice from professionals when required. Staff sought people's consent before providing care and support and demonstrated an understanding of capacity and best interest decision-making. Staff used structure and familiarity to reduce anxiety and support wellbeing.

Staff treated people with kindness and respect. Care was personalised and reflected people’s preferences, routines and life histories. People were involved in decisions about their care and were supported to maintain independence and make daily choices. Staff responded to people’s needs promptly and adapted care to minimise distress.

Staff involved people and those important to them in care planning and reviews. The provider monitored outcomes and adapted care when support requirements changed. The service promoted equity by ensuring people had equal access to activities, healthcare and community involvement.

Leaders promoted a positive and inclusive culture. Staff described managers as visible and approachable. Governance systems included audits, monitoring and regular review of incidents and performance. Leaders reviewed learning and made improvements where needed. Staff felt supported and were enabled to deliver care that was centred on people’s needs.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  • Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Contact and registration details

Details for Dana Home Care
Address18 Lodge Road, London, NW4 4EF
NeighbourhoodHendon, Barnet
Phone020 3191 8899
Websitewww.bondcare.co.uk/care-homes/dana-care/
Registered managerMark Willard
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Domiciliary care service
  • Supported living service
Who it supports
  • Dementia
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Older People
  • People with an eating disorder
  • Physical Disability
  • Sensory Impairment
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 3 inspection reports, latest 21 February 2019 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 5 August 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Dana Home Care
ProviderCare Worldwide (London) LimitedBrand: Care Worldwide
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number06358216 (opens Companies House)

Care Worldwide (London) Limited runs 4 services in London. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Care Worldwide (London) Limited

  1. G
    Colin Garden Lodge Care home, Barnet
    Good
  2. G
    Dana House Care home, Brent
    Good
  3. G
    Zinia House Care home, Barnet
    Good

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Hertsmere Valley Care Services Limited Home care, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  2. – Not yet rated
  3. –
    Hope Homecare Services Finchley Home care, 0.4 miles away
    Not yet rated
  4. G
    Exceptional Care At Home (Barnet) Home care, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  5. –
    Fairplacecare Home care, 0.4 miles away
    Not yet rated

See all home care in Barnet

Getting help from London Borough of Barnet

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Dana Home Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Dana Home Care.
When was Dana Home Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Dana Home Care was published on 5 August 2026.
Who runs Dana Home Care?
Dana Home Care is run by Care Worldwide (London) Limited. It runs 4 services in London.
What is Dana Home Care's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.