Rated Care Homes

Railway Bridge View

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 17 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 31 of 36

    rated home care services in Calderdale are rated Good, like this one.

Railway Bridge View: inspection record

Home care, Calderdale

Rated Good in May 2025.

Railway Bridge View: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. –
    CJP Outreach Services Ltd No overall rating, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Trailblazer Social Care Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Routes Healthcare - Kirklees Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. RI
    Fixby Healthcare Ltd Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Calderdale

See all home care services in Brighouse

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 May 2025 (assessment visit 7 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 14 to 24 April 2025. Railway Bridge View (Roche Homecare Ltd) is a care at home service providing support to adults of all ages who may be living with physical disabilities, sensory disabilities and dementia. This is the first assessment of this service since it registered with CQC.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Recruitment processes were secure and reliable. Sufficient staff were available to visit individuals at home safely and according to their preferred schedules. Team members were well-prepared, having received thorough training and orientation. Detailed risk evaluations addressed both the physical and emotional well-being of the people supported. Trained personnel administered medications safely. A strong culture of learning was evident, reflected in how staff discussed their roles and the continuous support they received.

Staff ensured individuals fully understood their care and treatment, allowing them to give informed consent. When individuals lacked mental capacity, staff worked with those close to them to make decisions in their best interest. People were actively involved in evaluating their own needs, with staff considering their communication styles, personal preferences, and health conditions. Care delivery followed current best practices and evidence-based approaches. Nutritional needs were met, and staff collaborated with other professionals to ensure smooth transitions and optimal care outcomes.

Staff well-being was supported by the provider. Privacy and individuality were respected, and personal choices were honored. People were encouraged to stay connected with their communities and maintain meaningful relationships.

People were informed about how to give feedback or make complaints, and they trusted the management to respond effectively. Care was delivered fairly and equally, with staff trained to recognize and address disparities in health and social care. People were included in making decisions about their care and were aware of their right to refuse or stop receiving services.

Staff expressed confidence in the leadership, particularly the registered manager, and felt safe to voice any concerns. Policies protected individuals with legally protected characteristics. A commitment to continual improvement was evident, with staff given opportunities and resources to innovate. The registered manager fulfilled their responsibilities, including reporting all required incidents to the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. We have rated this key question good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is our first assessment of this service. We have rated this key question good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Gemma Kendall
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Extra Care housing services
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14033611 (opens Companies House)

Roche Homecare Ltd runs 6 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Roche Homecare Ltd

  1. G
    Mansion House Good. Care home with nursing, North Yorkshire
  2. G
    Roche Homecare (Community) Good. Home care, Leeds
  3. G
    Tudor House Good. Care home with nursing, North Yorkshire
  4. G
    Wharfedale View Good. Home care, Leeds

See all 6 services run by Roche Homecare Ltd

Getting help from Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Railway Bridge View provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Railway Bridge View.
When was Railway Bridge View last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Railway Bridge View was published on 27 May 2025.
Who runs Railway Bridge View?
Railway Bridge View is run by Roche Homecare Ltd. It runs 6 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Railway Bridge View's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 May 2025.

Contact

Phone
07435 253392
Address
Bramston Street, Brighouse, HD6 3DH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. –
    CJP Outreach Services Ltd No overall rating, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Trailblazer Social Care Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Routes Healthcare - Kirklees Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. RI
    Fixby Healthcare Ltd Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Calderdale

See all home care services in Brighouse