Rated Care Homes

Elm Case Management Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 21 of 30

    rated home care services in Plymouth are rated Good, like this one.

Elm Case Management Limited: inspection record

Home care, Plymouth

Rated Good in April 2026.

Elm Case Management Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 April 2026 (assessment visit 17 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 19 to 27 February 2026. We visited Elm Case Management Limited on 19 and 25 February 2026.

We carried out this assessment because the service had not received a rating since its registration in 2023. The service was providing support to 4 people, of which some were receiving the regulated activity of personal care at the time of our assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Elm Case Management Limited is a specialist care at home service. The service uses the ‘Case Management’ advocacy and administrative approach to work with individuals who primarily have suffered a brain injury. The service both assessed the needs of the person to identify what their needs were to have a good quality of life in the community, and then to design and deliver a bespoke support system to meet each person’s needs. The service also supported people whose primary need was physical disability care. The service supported both younger adults and older people in Plymouth, and South and West Devon.

We assessed 33 Quality Statements under 5 Key Questions of: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well Led. Our overall rating for this service is Good.

People were protected and kept safe. The service risk assessed and reviewed people’s needs and acted when needed. Staff reviewed assessments considering all aspects of the person’s life including; people’s cognition, communication, lifestyle preferences, personal care and health needs.

There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience to meet people’s needs. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervision and appraisals to deliver high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well.

People were treated with kindness and compassion by the staff and management of the service. Staff and managers treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in all aspects of their daily life and in their care. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity and the confidentiality of their information.

People were closely supported to have a good lifestyle living in their own home, sometimes with their families, and enjoying activities as part of the community. People were enabled to take part in activities and engagement which ensured each person had new development, and stimulating activities, in their lives.

The service worked with all agencies and professionals involved in people’s care for their best outcomes and to deliver effective support in whatever location they were temporarily, for example, in hospital. The service worked through Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) review meetings, involving both the person and their relatives, to ensure they were fully involved and understood their care and support. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care for people.

The provider, who was also the registered manager, was overseeing the governance and improvement of the service. The service leadership team and the provider supported staff wellbeing and there was a shared vision and culture in the service. Leaders in the service were aware they needed to further develop aspects of care planning and risk assessment to fully meet peoples’ needs.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this previously unrated service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this previously unrated service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this previously unrated service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this previously unrated service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this previously unrated service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Suzi Rodd
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Rehabilitation services
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13952561 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Plymouth City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Elm Case Management Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Elm Case Management Limited.
When was Elm Case Management Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Elm Case Management Limited was published on 24 April 2026.
Who runs Elm Case Management Limited?
Elm Case Management Limited is run by Elm Case Management Limited.
What is Elm Case Management Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 April 2026.