Rated Care Homes

Sparrow Health Care Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 13 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 22 of 205

    rated home care services in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Sparrow Health Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

Rated Requires improvement in September 2025.

Sparrow Health Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: 42 Alexandra Road (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and ASL (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    42 Alexandra Road Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    ASL Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Guras Home Care - Main Office Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Vine Social Care Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. O
    Home Instead Farnborough, Farnham and Fleet Outstanding, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Farnborough

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 September 2025 (assessment visit 30 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment site visit took place on 17 June 2025. Sparrow Health Care is a home care agency providing care and support to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the assessment, the service was supporting 42 people with 2 people in receipt of the regulated activity of personal care. The inspection was carried out due to concerns regarding the managerial oversight of the service and how risks to people’s safety were being managed. The provider’s nominated individual and registered manager of Sparrow Health Care are the same person. They are referred to as the provider throughout this report.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance Care Quality Commission (CQC) follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it. The provider was not fully aware of this guidance and had not ensured it was known to staff and embedded into practice.

Risks to people were not always fully assessed, and risk assessments were not consistently completed or detailed. Medicines were not always managed safely, and staff did not always complete records in relation to medicines administration and recording. Accidents and incidents were not always reported in detail and were not used to inform learning. Safeguarding concerns were not reported in line with guidelines and information requested to support safeguarding investigations was not provided in a timely manner.

Staff were not recruited safely as checks on their suitability and eligibility to work in the UK had not always been completed. Records to confirm staff had received a full induction, training and supervision were not maintained.

The provider’s governance systems had not been effective in identifying or addressing the areas for improvement we found during this assessment. The provider did not complete audits of the service and had not implemented an action plan to address shortfalls they were aware of. The provider told us they had recognised the need to expand the management team to ensure better oversight of the service. Staff had been recruited into senior positions although had not fully established how their roles would work together.

The service was in breach of 5 legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment, good governance, staffing and safe recruitment. Following the inspection we issued warning notices highlighting the improvements the provider needed to make in relation to safe recruitment systems and governance. We have also asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

Despite these concerns, people and their relatives told us they were very happy with the service they received and felt they were supported well. There was evidence of other professionals being involved in people’s care and support. Staff told us they were supported by the provider and felt the provider was approachable and open in their approach.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, the way people’s medicines were managed, how people were safeguarded from potential abuse, the recruitment, training and supervision of staff.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to management and oversight and how best practice guidance was implemented.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to management oversight and the governance of the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 30 September 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 30 September 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 30 September 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how people are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 30 September 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.

Registration details

Registered manager
Vasskicki Musa
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12327971 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Sparrow Health Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Sparrow Health Care Ltd.
When was Sparrow Health Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sparrow Health Care Ltd was published on 30 September 2025.
Who runs Sparrow Health Care Ltd?
Sparrow Health Care Ltd is run by Sparrow Health Care Ltd.
What is Sparrow Health Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 30 September 2025.

Contact

Phone
01252 912830
Address
26 Alexandra Road, Farnborough, GU14 6DA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: 42 Alexandra Road (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and ASL (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    42 Alexandra Road Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    ASL Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Guras Home Care - Main Office Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Vine Social Care Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. O
    Home Instead Farnborough, Farnham and Fleet Outstanding, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Farnborough