Motaryli Ltd
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2022
- Central Sheffield, Sheffield, Yorkshire and the Humber
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
At a glance
No rating
No ratings have been published for this service yet.
96%
of rated home care services in Sheffield are Good or Outstanding (90% across Yorkshire and the Humber, 88% across England).
Motaryli Ltd: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Pillar Nursing Placements Limited (Good, 0.7 miles away) and Birchwood & Co Case Management Ltd (Good, 0.8 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- – PH Healthcare Solutions Ltd Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
- G Pillar Nursing Placements Limited Good, 0.7 miles away
- – Global Com Enterprise Ltd Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
- G Birchwood & Co Case Management Ltd Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Choices Homecare (Sheffield) Good, 0.8 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 February 2026 (assessment visit 10 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 15 of December 2025 to 07 January 2026. Motaryli Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people living in their own homes. CQC only inspects where people are receiving the regulated activity personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time of this assessment only 1 person was receiving support with personal care. This was a targeted assessment, looking at quality statements within Safe, Effective and Well-led. During the last assessment, we served a warning notice due to in-effective governance. The service was also in breach of legal regulations in relation to need for consent, safe care and treatment and fit and proper persons employed.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We carried out this assessment to see if improvements had been made. At this visit we found the service had made some improvements due to the implementation of new systems, but further improvements were required, and the service remains in breach of regulation 17.
We found the person’s care plan and risk assessments were more detailed and provided staff with the knowledge and guidance to deliver safe, personalised care.
During the last assessment, we found the quality assurance systems for the safe recruitment of staff were not robust. The service had now implemented a new recruitment process, which was more effective in ensuring staff were recruited safely and the correct pre-employment checks were being carried out.
At our last assessment, systems and processes regarding consent practices required improvement to ensure legislation and best practice was being adhered to.At this assessment, the person had appropriate safeguards in place to ensure their finances were being managed safely by the service, with the person’s knowledge and understanding of this being recorded within their care records.
In relation to governance, at the time of the assessment, the registered manager was being supported to implement new systems and processes into the service and was in the early stages of understanding and using the new quality assurance tools. The registered manager demonstrated their new governance plan to us, but since the implementation of the new systems, we could not be assured how sufficient these were due to the short amount of time they had been in place. We found the service’s policies required further amendments to ensure practice was safe and effective. The service remains in breach of regulation relating to good governance, due to insufficient evidence that governance has been effective since our last assessment. These new systems required embedding into practice, ensuring the registered manager had clear knowledge and oversight of the new governance systems within their service.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.
This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of regulation 17 relating to good governance.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Mollyn Mapunde
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Motaryli Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 13634229 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Sheffield City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Sheffield City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0114 273 4908
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Sheffield City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Motaryli Ltd provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Motaryli Ltd.
- When was Motaryli Ltd last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Motaryli Ltd was published on 12 February 2026.
- Who runs Motaryli Ltd?
- Motaryli Ltd is run by Motaryli Ltd.
- What is Motaryli Ltd's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Contact
- Phone
- 07525 924453
- Address
- 83 Wilkinson Street, Sheffield, S10 2GJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Pillar Nursing Placements Limited (Good, 0.7 miles away) and Birchwood & Co Case Management Ltd (Good, 0.8 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- – PH Healthcare Solutions Ltd Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
- G Pillar Nursing Placements Limited Good, 0.7 miles away
- – Global Com Enterprise Ltd Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
- G Birchwood & Co Case Management Ltd Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Choices Homecare (Sheffield) Good, 0.8 miles away