Rated Care Homes

Cheshire Support Services

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 93%

    of rated home care services in Cheshire West and Chester are Good or Outstanding (91% across the North West, 88% across England).

Cheshire Support Services: inspection record

Home care, Cheshire West and Chester

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Cheshire Support Services: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ace Care Professionals Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Homecarers Cheshire Mid (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Ace Care Professionals Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Evolving Care Ltd Winsford Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Archangel Home Care Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. –
    Marbury Health Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Weaver Lodge Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Cheshire West and Chester

See all home care services in Meadowbank

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 July 2026 (assessment visit 1 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 29 April to 22 May 2026. Site visits to the providers registered office address were carried out on 29 April and 11 May 2026.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not delivering personal care to anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

Cheshire Support Services is a domiciliary care service registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. During the assessment, 3 regulatory breaches in respect of safe care and treatment, staffing and governance were identified.

Systems to mitigate risks to people’s safety were not managed effectively. The assessment and planning of people’s care did not always adhere to best practice guidance. Where people had individual risks, we found no adequate assessment of these risks had been completed. However, we found staff were knowledgeable about people’s care needs and risks and they could confidently describe the action they took to keep people safe and reduce the risk of harm.

Staff were not always safely recruited and sufficient staff were not deployed to cover both the emergency and the routine work of the service. We found a lack of robust contingency plans to ensure the continuity of people’s care.

Systems in place to ensure the safe management of medicines were not effective. When people required support with medicines, they did not always have a detailed care plan in place and not all staff administering medicines had their competency assessed in line with best practice guidance.

Leaders had not created a positive and inclusive culture that supported the delivery of high-quality care. Governance systems did not enable the provider to identify where quality and/or safety were being compromised to ensure they could respond appropriately and without delay. The provider’s auditing systems had not identified all shortfalls which meant opportunities to improve the safety of the service were missed.

Staff treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and understood the importance of gaining consent prior to supporting people with care. Staff supported people to manage their health and wellbeing. Staff described the action they took when a person was unwell and required a review from external health professionals.

The provider acknowledged some areas of the service required improvement and further development. They responded positively to CQC feedback demonstrating a clear commitment to ensuring going forward the culture and delivery of care met regulatory requirements.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first comprehensive assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The provider was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and staffing.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first comprehensive assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The provider was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to good governance.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first comprehensive assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first comprehensive assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The provider was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to good governance.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 27 November 2019. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 27 November 2019. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 27 November 2019. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Gail Gibbons
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13269724 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Cheshire West and Chester Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cheshire Support Services provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Cheshire Support Services.
When was Cheshire Support Services last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cheshire Support Services was published on 1 July 2026.
Who runs Cheshire Support Services?
Cheshire Support Services is run by Cheshire Support Services Limited.
What is Cheshire Support Services's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07762 109170
Address
Wharton Park House, Nat Lane, Winsford, CW7 3BS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ace Care Professionals Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Homecarers Cheshire Mid (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Ace Care Professionals Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Evolving Care Ltd Winsford Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Archangel Home Care Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. –
    Marbury Health Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Weaver Lodge Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Cheshire West and Chester

See all home care services in Meadowbank