Rated Care Homes

The Village Care Group Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 3 of 51

    rated home care services in South Gloucestershire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

The Village Care Group Limited: inspection record

Home care, South Gloucestershire

Rated Requires improvement in April 2026.

The Village Care Group Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Hatch Camphill Community (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Olive Leaf Health & Homecare Limited (Good, 4.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    The Hatch Camphill Community Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Blueline Healthcare Solutions Ltd Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away
  3. –
    Odan Healthcare Agency Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. I
    Rebound Healthcare Limited Inadequate, 4.1 miles away

See all home care services in South Gloucestershire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 April 2026 (assessment visit 9 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 24 February 2026 to the 25 February 2026.

The Village Care Group Limited is a domiciliary care service registered to provide personal care to individuals living in their own homes. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. Personal care is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time of the inspection the service supported 47 people with personal care.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This was the first inspection of the service since it was registered with us in November 2022. We reviewed all quality statements across the key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led at this assessment. Our overall rating for this service is requires improvement.

We gathered information from people who use the service, relatives, the registered manager, the provider, a care coordinator and care staff. We sought feedback from health and social care professionals and had feedback from 2.

At this assessment, we found 3 breaches of legal regulation, in safe staffing, safe care and treatment and good governance.

During our inspection we found improvements were needed to people’s care planning information and associated documentation, including medicines information, people’s risk assessments and where topical creams posed a flammable risk. Suitable checks were not being undertaken prior to staff being employed by the service and the provider was not ensuring employment documentation was being completed. We also found improvements were needed to staff training to ensure staff had suitable skills and knowledge to undertake their role. The provider’s quality assurance systems had identified shortfalls to the recruitment of staff and some staff training, however, we found the provider had no quality assurance system in place to identify improvements to people’s care planning documentation, or to staff employment documentation.

Although we found shortfalls during our inspection, feedback from people and relatives about the care and support provided to them was positive. All staff felt it was a nice place to work, and the support provided by the management of the service was good. Staff provided people with choice and control, and they provided care that respected their individual wishes. The registered manager had a diverse workforce, and they supported staff with a flexible approach to their individual needs although we were not always assured this was within employment law.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of 2 legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and staffing.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. We found improvements were needed to the provider’s governance arrangements and having accurate documentation relating to the employment of staff. The service is in breach of 1 legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 20 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 20 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Debra Jones
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13708284 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from South Gloucestershire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Village Care Group Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for The Village Care Group Limited.
When was The Village Care Group Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Village Care Group Limited was published on 20 April 2026.
Who runs The Village Care Group Limited?
The Village Care Group Limited is run by The Village Care Group Limited.
What is The Village Care Group Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 20 April 2026.

Contact

Address
63 High Street, Thornbury, Bristol, BS35 2AN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Hatch Camphill Community (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Olive Leaf Health & Homecare Limited (Good, 4.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    The Hatch Camphill Community Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Blueline Healthcare Solutions Ltd Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away
  3. –
    Odan Healthcare Agency Not yet rated, 4.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. I
    Rebound Healthcare Limited Inadequate, 4.1 miles away

See all home care services in South Gloucestershire