Rated Care Homes

Acorn Care Solutions Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 22 of 205

    rated home care services in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Acorn Care Solutions Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

Rated Requires improvement in January 2026.

Acorn Care Solutions Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Nurseplus UK - Gosport (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Home Instead Fareham & Gosport (Outstanding, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Caregiver Station Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Hope for Future Care Ltd - Hampshire Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Nurseplus UK - Gosport Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. O
    Home Instead Fareham & Gosport Outstanding, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Kanyuchi Healthcare Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 January 2026 (assessment visit 25 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 02 to 17 October 2025. This was an assessment covering all 5 key questions. This assessment was prompted by a review of the information we held about the service. This was our first assessment of the service since the provider registered with CQC in February 2023. The service is a care at home service providing support to older and younger people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. Personal care is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time we started our assessment; they were providing personal care services to 73 people.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider lacked effective governance in relation to monitoring and improving quality and safety. This had resulted in shortfalls in the registered manager’s oversight of the service and issues related to care visit l monitoring, medicines administration, incident and safeguarding reporting, care planning and auditing key areas of the service. This led to instances where people did not receive the care they needed, when they needed it. People told us they had received an inconsistent experience of receiving care.

The provider did not always comprehensively plan how to make improvements to the service when issues had been found. The provider did not always collaborate effectively with stakeholders to promote positive outcomes for people or improve safety. Staff record keeping in relation to key areas of care was not consistent and did not evidence how risks were managed, or shortfalls addressed. However, the registered manager was receptive to CQC’s feedback and has taken steps to make initial changes to improve safety and quality.

There were enough staff in place to meet people’s needs, but the provider did not always ensure they had effective oversight of staff’s ongoing training requirements. This resulted in staff not always receiving timely training updates. People told us they received consistent staff whom they had positive working relationships with. People said staff understood their needs and treated them with dignity and respect. However, when regular staff were absent, people told us the temporary replacements were not as familiar with their needs or motivated in their role.

People told us improvements were needed around how effectively the provider communicated with them about their care. They told us they were not always informed about changes to their care or changes to the staff allocated. However, people told us they felt staff were responsive to their needs. People told us they were involved in planning and reviewing their care.

The service is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not used by anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person.

The provider was in breach of 1 legal regulation relating to good governance.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    Records relating to people’s care and safety incidents were not sufficiently comprehensive to ensure safe care. The provider was in breach of 1 legal regulation relating to good governance.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The provider was in breach of 1 legal regulation relating to good governance.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 8 January 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 8 January 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 8 January 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 8 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14221328 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Acorn Care Solutions Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Acorn Care Solutions Ltd.
When was Acorn Care Solutions Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Acorn Care Solutions Ltd was published on 8 January 2026.
Who runs Acorn Care Solutions Ltd?
Acorn Care Solutions Ltd is run by Acorn Care Solutions Ltd.
What is Acorn Care Solutions Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 8 January 2026.

Contact

Phone
07359 328452
Address
54 Gregson Avenue, Gosport, PO13 0UR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Nurseplus UK - Gosport (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Home Instead Fareham & Gosport (Outstanding, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Caregiver Station Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Hope for Future Care Ltd - Hampshire Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Nurseplus UK - Gosport Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. O
    Home Instead Fareham & Gosport Outstanding, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Kanyuchi Healthcare Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire