Rated Care Homes

Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell)

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 4 of 17

    rated home care services in Bracknell Forest are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell): inspection record

Home care, Bracknell Forest

Rated Requires improvement in October 2026, up from Inadequate.

Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: County Carers Limited (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Your Life (Crowthorne) (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    3 County Care No overall rating, 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Rose Heart Health Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    County Carers Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Your Life (Crowthorne) Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    Care Quality Services Berkshire Not yet rated, 1 mile away

See all home care services in Bracknell Forest

See all home care services in Crowthorne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 October 2026 (assessment visit 3 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 11 August 2026 to 18 August 2026.

Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell) is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of this assessment, 104 people were receiving a regulated activity. This was a comprehensive assessment of all quality statements. We carried out this assessment due to the concerns and enforcement action taken at the previous assessment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ (RSRCRC) is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it. The service met the principles of this guidance. People’s care records contained information which was person-centred. Mental capacity assessments were completed; however, this required strengthening as it was not always done in line with all the codes of practice. Staff received training to support people with a learning disability and autistic people.

During this assessment, we found shortfalls in the provider’s governance, oversight and quality assurance arrangements. Leaders had not established effective and sustainable systems to identify, monitor and address all risks to people’s health, safety and welfare. As a result, the provider was not able to demonstrate they had effective oversight of the quality and safety of care being delivered.

The provider had care plans and risk assessments in place at the time of this assessment. Information about people’s risks was noted. Details about people’s social and life history was available and most notes were recorded in a person-centred way.

We found discrepancies between care plans, daily records and medicines administration records (MAR). Medicines information was not always accurate or complete. This increased the risk of medicines not being managed safely or in accordance with people’s assessed needs and prescribing instructions.

Although these concerns had not resulted in any known harm to people at the time of our assessment, the provider’s lack of oversight meant they could not be assured risks would be identified and addressed promptly. People and relatives consistently told us staff were kind, caring and respectful.

Improvements were found at this inspection, and the provider was no longer in breach of regulations relating to person-centred care, need for consent, safe care and treatment and staffing. However, the provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance.

This service has been in Special Measures since August 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 13 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 13 October 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 October 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sadie Jeater
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 25 January 2019. Latest assessment published 13 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
OM Care LtdBrand: Caremark
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07167593 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Bracknell Forest Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell) provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell).
When was Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell) was published on 13 October 2026.
Who runs Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell)?
Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell) is run by OM Care Ltd.
What is Caremark (Wokingham and Bracknell)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 13 October 2026.

Contact

Address
283 High Street, Crowthorne, RG45 7AH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: County Carers Limited (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Your Life (Crowthorne) (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    3 County Care No overall rating, 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Rose Heart Health Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    County Carers Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Your Life (Crowthorne) Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    Care Quality Services Berkshire Not yet rated, 1 mile away

See all home care services in Bracknell Forest

See all home care services in Crowthorne