Mappleton
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2023
- East Riding of Yorkshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
33 of 39
rated home care services in East Riding of Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.
Mappleton: inspection record
Rated Good in November 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Bells Home Care Limited Requires improvement, 2.7 miles away
- G Voyage (DCA) Hull and East Riding Good, 8.2 miles away
- G Richmond House Social Care Services CIC Good, 9.4 miles away
- – Reliance Community Care Limited East Riding Not yet rated, 9.5 miles away
- G Foxglove Supported Living Limited Good, 9.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 November 2025 (assessment visit 26 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 29 and 30 October 2025
Mappleton is a domiciliary care agency providing care to older people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection 11 people were receiving support with personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. This was the first inspection for this service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service demonstrated consistently high standards of caring, with staff delivering care that was respectful, compassionate, and tailored to individual needs. People were treated with dignity and kindness and were actively involved in decisions about their care. Staff understood the importance of emotional connection and built trusting relationships with those people they supported.
Care was highly person-centred. Staff adapted their approach to reflect people’s preferences, strengths, and backgrounds. Independence and choice were promoted, and staff responded promptly and appropriately to people’s needs. Continuity of care was supported by a stable team and effective use of electronic systems, ensuring care remained responsive and consistent.
Staff felt well-supported and worked collaboratively in a team environment described by one staff member as “like a family”. This contributed to a positive culture where staff were enabled to deliver high-quality, compassionate care. Workforce wellbeing was prioritised, and staff were confident in raising concerns and contributing to service improvement.
Information was accessible and tailored to individuals. Feedback was actively sought and used to improve care. Equity in access and outcomes was promoted, with staff trained in equality and diversity. Planning for future needs, including end-of-life care, was proactive and handled with sensitivity.
Leadership was visible and inclusive. Managers promoted a culture of openness and mutual respect, where staff felt empowered to speak up. Governance was strong, with clear accountability and effective audit processes. Partnerships with external professionals and the community were well-established, and continuous learning was embedded in practice.
Safety was well-managed. Incident reporting and audits were routine, with learning embedded into practice. Safeguarding processes were robust, and staff were confident in raising issues. Risk management was person-led and environments were regularly assessed. Staffing levels were appropriate, recruitment checks were thorough, and infection prevention measures were consistently applied. Medicines were managed safely, with clear protocols and documentation.
Care was effective, with good outcomes for people. Needs were thoroughly assessed and reviewed, and care plans reflected individual routines and preferences. Staff worked well with external professionals to support healthier, more independent lives. Consent was sought and respected.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Kirsty Evans
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Dignity Homecare Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 14347122 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Riding of Yorkshire Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01482 393939
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Mappleton provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Mappleton.
- When was Mappleton last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Mappleton was published on 11 November 2025.
- Who runs Mappleton?
- Mappleton is run by Dignity Homecare Ltd.
- What is Mappleton's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 November 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 07572 634324
- Address
- Main Road, Mappleton, Hornsea, HU18 1XR Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Bells Home Care Limited Requires improvement, 2.7 miles away
- G Voyage (DCA) Hull and East Riding Good, 8.2 miles away
- G Richmond House Social Care Services CIC Good, 9.4 miles away
- – Reliance Community Care Limited East Riding Not yet rated, 9.5 miles away
- G Foxglove Supported Living Limited Good, 9.6 miles away