Axela Care
Home care, Brent
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Axela Care: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Requires improvement in 2016, then Good in 2018 and August 2026.
The latest rating was published 2 months ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 59 Good home care services in Brent, out of 69 with a rating.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 August 2026 (assessment visit 27 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service
Axela Care Limited is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to adults in their own homes.
Read the full summary
Who the service is for
This service supports older people and people with physical disabilities, dementia and mental health needs, who are living in their own homes. At the time of the inspection there were 12 people using the service.
Key findings
We carried out this assessment on 30 June 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
The provider demonstrated a learning culture of openness and transparency. Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and report incidents and felt fully supported when they did. One staff member said, “We have a policy in place and training on safeguarding and know what to do if we come across this, speak to the person to find out what happened, record this and report to the office immediately.” Lessons were learnt and communicated widely to ensure improvements were made, a staff member told us, “At team meetings we discuss incidents and reflect on practice and any safeguarding’s that are raised.”
Staff had access to personal protective equipment and up to date training in infection prevention control. People’s home environments were assessed to ensure they were suitable and safe for the delivery of care.
The provider assessed people’s needs prior to the service commencing. Care plans and risk assessments were detailed and person-centred reflecting people's individual support needs, backgrounds, likes and dislikes. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people's needs and knew them well.
People were supported by enough competent staff who had the right mix of skills, experience and knowledge to support them safely. Appropriate recruitment checks were carried out as standard practice. Staff received induction, training, supervision and ongoing support from their managers to ensure they carried out their roles effectively. One staff member said, “The induction was very good and there was lots of shadowing opportunities from more experienced staff who supported and helped me and even tested me by asking what I needed to do, which gave me more confidence.” Medicines were managed safely, with clear procedures for administration, recording, and monitoring within people's homes.
Appropriate referrals were made to health care professionals and services when concerns or changes in people’s needs were identified. Comments from visiting health care professional included, “They (the provider) send in supervisors to follow up on queries; they usually prompt us if there are changes in care needs,” and “The Information I handover to leaders is recorded and shared via written notes and electronic systems and team meetings.”
Staff supported people to make decisions about their care and treatment, and consent was sought before support was provided.
People, relatives and staff were encouraged to share feedback about the service, and the provider had systems in place to use this information to support continuous improvement. Care plans reflected people’s preferences and demonstrated their views were listened to and acted upon.The provider promoted equality, diversity and inclusion, ensuring people received fair and equitable care and support.
The provider prioritised staff morale, retention, and a positive, inclusive working culture. There were clear shared values and staff felt they worked collaboratively with management to deliver the goals of the service. One staff member told us, " Management are always there for help and support, which helps us grow and become more confident. At team meetings they (managers) also provide lunch for us so it’s a time to socialize and get together as well and people can get to know each other, it’s really nice and thoughtful.” This demonstrated a shared commitment to delivering person-centred care and positive outcomes for people.
The provider had governance systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service. Audits, care plan reviews, spot checks, feedback, incident reviews and management oversight were used to identify areas for improvement and monitor service performance. Leaders demonstrated commitment across the service to good practice, service performance and risk management. Staff were engaged with processes and used these systems effectively, addressing problems openly and swiftly through collaborative and responsive leadership. Spot checks took place to support staff in delivering high quality care and to ensure any learning was identified and actioned.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 32 Station Parade, London, London, NW2 4NX |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Willesden, Brent |
| Phone | 020 3903 6377 |
| Website | www.axelacare.co.uk |
| Registered manager | Nicholas Kelly |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 2 inspection reports, latest 26 June 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 3 August 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Axela Care Limited |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 08605035 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- G Respect Care Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayGood
- G ANA Homecare Ltd Willesden Home care, 0.7 miles awayGood
- – Action Plan Care Ltd Home care, 0.9 miles awayNot yet rated
- G Brookes Home Care Services Ltd Home care, 0.9 miles awayGood
- G City Carers Home care, 0.9 miles awayGood
Getting help from London Borough of Brent
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Brent
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8937 4300, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm. Out-of-hours emergencies: 020 8863 5250
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Brent
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Axela Care provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Axela Care.
- When was Axela Care last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Axela Care was published on 3 August 2026.
- Who runs Axela Care?
- Axela Care is run by Axela Care Limited.
- What is Axela Care's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 August 2026.