Homely Supported Living Ltd
Home care, Redbridge
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Homely Supported Living Ltd: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 2 times since 2019. Rated Good in 2019 and August 2026.
It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2019. The latest rating was published 2 months ago.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 August 2026 (assessment visit 24 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026.
Homely Supported Living Ltd is a ‘supported living’ service and is registered to provide the regulated activity of personal care to people, primarily with a learning disability living in their own homes. The service was supporting 6 people with personal care at the time of the assessment.
Read the full summary
Not everyone using Homely Supported Living Ltd received a regulated activity; the CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided. This assessment was carried out with a site visit to the office location on 27 July 2026 and a supported living service on 3 August 2026.
We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Safeguarding systems were in place to ensure people were safeguarded from abuse. The provider demonstrated a learning culture of openness and transparency with learning taking place following incidents. People’s home environment was assessed to ensure they were suitable and safe for the delivery of care. Risks were identified and assessments were carried out to ensure risks associated with people were minimised. Systems were in place to ensure staff were recruited safely and people were supported by competent staff who had the right mix of skills, experience and knowledge to support them safely. Staff were supported well by the management team and received regular supervision to support them in their roles. Medicines were managed safely. Staff were trained to administer medicines and records showed people received their medicines as prescribed.
The provider assessed people’s needs prior to the service commencing and care plans included people’s preferences on how they would like to be supported. Staff monitored people's care and support, wellbeing and expected outcomes. Consent was sought from people and Mental Capacity Assessments were completed to determine if people had capacity to make specific decisions about their care.
We observed staff had a good relationship with people and were caring and kind when supporting people. People’s privacy and dignity was respected. People were encouraged to be independent, such as going shopping and helping with household tasks.
Some improvements were required with care plans to ensure people received person centred care at all times. Staff communicated effectively with people.
People, relatives and staff were encouraged to share feedback about the service, and the provider had systems in place to use this information to support continuous improvement of the service. There was an open and positive culture within the service and staff were positive about the management team. Quality assurance systems were in place to ensure there was oversight of the service and people received safe and effective care.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 14, Clements Court, Clements Way, Ilford, IG1 2QY |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Ilford, Redbridge |
| Phone | 020 8306 1483 |
| Registered manager | Loreta Okpara |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Homely Supported Living Ltd |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 11220585 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- G Aark Health Limited Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayGood
- G Care Avenues Limited - London Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayGood
- – Caring Arms Together Ltd Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayNot yet rated
- G Dennyson Care Limited Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayGood
- G Felix Health Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayGood
Getting help from London Borough of Redbridge
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Redbridge
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0208 708 7333
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Redbridge
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Homely Supported Living Ltd provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Homely Supported Living Ltd.
- When was Homely Supported Living Ltd last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Homely Supported Living Ltd was published on 19 August 2026.
- Who runs Homely Supported Living Ltd?
- Homely Supported Living Ltd is run by Homely Supported Living Ltd.
- What is Homely Supported Living Ltd's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.