Rated Care Homes

Homelium West Sussex

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 138

    rated home care services in West Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Homelium West Sussex: inspection record

Home care, West Sussex

Rated Requires improvement in August 2026.

Homelium West Sussex: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Your Hope Care Ltd (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Brendoncare Stildon Mews (Good, 1.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Your Hope Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    London Care (Lingfield Lodge) Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Brendoncare Stildon Mews Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Your Quality Care Services Limited (East Grinstead) Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
  5. G
    College of St Barnabas Good, 2.3 miles away

See all home care services in West Sussex

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 August 2026 (assessment visit 16 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 4 June 2026. Homelium West Sussex is a homecare agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. This was the first assessment of the service. At the time of our assessment, 53 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. People and relatives generally felt safe and described staff as kind, caring and respectful. One relative said, "The staff are lovely and they keep [person] safe and look after them very well.” People valued receiving support from staff who knew them well and understood their preferences and routines. Several people and relatives told us staff promoted people's independence, respected their choices and often went above and beyond to provide support. Assessments were completed before care started, and people and those important to them were involved in planning their care and support. Staff promoted people’s dignity and worked with professionals when people’s needs changed. However, some people experienced late or rushed visits, did not always receive support from familiar staff and staff were not always given sufficient travel time between visits. Care plans, risk assessments and medicines records were not always accurate, complete, person-specific or up to date. Safeguarding concerns, accidents and incidents were not consistently recorded, monitored or analysed to identify learning, mitigate risks and drive improvement. Governance and quality assurance systems were not effective and had not identified or addressed all the shortfalls found during the assessment. This included insufficient oversight of care planning, risk management, medicines records, safeguarding processes and compliance with the provider’s conditions of registration. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance. There was no registered manager in post at the time of the assessment, although an application was in progress. Following our feedback, the provider responded proactively and submitted a detailed action plan setting out the action taken and planned to address the concerns identified. The provider had already begun implementing improvements, including enhanced oversight, auditing and monitoring arrangements. However, these changes were at an early stage and the provider had not yet demonstrated that they were fully implemented, effective or embedded within the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance. Governance and quality assurance systems were not effective and had not identified or addressed all the shortfalls found during the assessment. This included oversight of care plans and risk assessments, safeguarding and incident records, and compliance with the provider’s conditions of registration.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 4 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 4 August 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 4 August 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 4 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13319849 (opens Companies House)

Homelium Care Limited runs 6 services in England, 2 of them in the South East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Homelium Care Limited

  1. G
    Homelium Dorset Good. Home care, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, South West
  2. G
    Homelium Essex Good. Home care, Essex, East of England
  3. –
    Homelium Hampshire Not yet rated. Home care, Hampshire
  4. –
    Homelium Northampton Not yet rated. Home care, West Northamptonshire, East Midlands

See all 6 services run by Homelium Care Limited

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Homelium West Sussex provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Homelium West Sussex.
When was Homelium West Sussex last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Homelium West Sussex was published on 4 August 2026.
Who runs Homelium West Sussex?
Homelium West Sussex is run by Homelium Care Limited. It runs 6 services in England, 2 of them in the South East.
What is Homelium West Sussex's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 4 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01342 645461
Address
59 High Street, East Grinstead, RH19 3DD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Your Hope Care Ltd (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Brendoncare Stildon Mews (Good, 1.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Your Hope Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    London Care (Lingfield Lodge) Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Brendoncare Stildon Mews Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Your Quality Care Services Limited (East Grinstead) Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
  5. G
    College of St Barnabas Good, 2.3 miles away

See all home care services in West Sussex