Rated Care Homes

College of St Barnabas

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2014.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 234 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

College of St Barnabas: inspection record

Care home, 28 beds, Surrey

Rated Good in March 2020.

College of St Barnabas: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Greathed Manor Nursing Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Spring Park Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Lingfield Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Knowle House Nursing Home Good, 1.5 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Dormans Park

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 18 March 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The College of St Barnabas is a registered charity providing accommodation, care and support to retired members of the Anglican clergy and their wives and widows. Accommodation on the College site includes a care home with nursing for a maximum of 28 people. There were 25 people living in the care home at the time of our inspection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The College also provides accommodation for eight couples and 20 single people in 'The Cloisters' flats. This accommodation is not registered with CQC. The College is registered to provide personal care to people living in The Cloisters, although this was not being provided at the time of our inspection.

People's experience of using this service: People received their care from consistent staff who knew their needs and preferences well. Staff were kind and treated people with respect. People and their relatives were involved in planning their care. Staff encouraged people to make choices and respected their decisions.

Some people's care records were not accurate or up-to-date. This had not adversely impacted people's care as staff knew their needs and provided the support they required. However, there was a risk that people could receive inappropriate care as their care plans did not always accurately reflect their needs. We have made a recommendation about this.

The management team communicated effectively with people, relatives and professionals. People and their families and staff were able to give their views about the service and these were listened to and acted upon.

There were enough staff deployed on each shift to meet people's needs. Staff received appropriate training for their roles and received good support from the management team. Staff understood their role in safeguarding people and knew how to recognise and respond to abuse.

Risks were assessed and managed effectively. Medicines were managed safely. Staff maintained appropriate standards of hygiene and infection control. The provider operated robust recruitment procedures which helped ensure that only suitable staff were employed.

People were supported to maintain good health and to obtain medical treatment when they needed it. Staff worked well with other professionals involved in people's care and followed any guidance put in place by professionals.

People had access to a wide range of activities, events and outings. Relatives were made welcome when they visited and were encouraged to be involved in the life of the home. People's religious and spiritual needs were met. People generally enjoyed the food at the home and had opportunities to give their views about the menu.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 March 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Suzan Jack
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing, Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 18 March 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
00061253 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
205220

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does College of St Barnabas provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists College of St Barnabas as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does College of St Barnabas have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 28 beds at College of St Barnabas.
When was College of St Barnabas last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for College of St Barnabas was published on 18 March 2020.
Who runs College of St Barnabas?
College of St Barnabas is run by College Of St. Barnabas(The).
What is College of St Barnabas's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 March 2020.