Mynas Care Ltd
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2024
- Brierfield, Lancashire, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
183 of 199
rated home care services in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.
Mynas Care Ltd: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G AFG Community West Lancashire Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- – GPAH RC NELSON Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Astra Care Services Limited Good, 0.1 miles away
- – Beyond Homecare Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G Homecare for you Limited Lancashire Good, 0.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 July 2026 (assessment visit 18 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: Onsite assessment 25 and 26 June 2026. The service is a care at home service providing support to adults of all ages, people living with dementia, mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. Although the service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns, some improvements were needed around the recording of this. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly, should they arise. People were protected and kept safe and staff understood and managed risks. Infection control practices were in place and there were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care, though mandatory triaging in supporting people with a learning disability had not been provided to staff. Medicines practices needed to be improved.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People were involved in assessments of their needs, though some records relating to this sometimes needed to be more consistent. Assessments were created and reviewed taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People were supported to stay healthy and retain their independence. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care to encourage better outcomes. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. The Registered Manager made sure people understood their care and treatment, which enabled them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people in their care.
People’s privacy and dignity was protected, and people were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and staff responded to people’s needs. The service supported staff wellbeing.
People were involved in decisions about their care and the service provided information to people in formats they could understand. People knew how to give feedback and felt confident the service acted on it. The service worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.
Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of wanting to drive continuous improvement, though some aspects of governance needed to be improved.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence the service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Farzana Khan
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Mynas Care Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 15105776 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Lancashire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Lancashire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 123 6720. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0300 123 6722
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Lancashire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Mynas Care Ltd provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Mynas Care Ltd.
- When was Mynas Care Ltd last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Mynas Care Ltd was published on 20 July 2026.
- Who runs Mynas Care Ltd?
- Mynas Care Ltd is run by Mynas Care Ltd.
- What is Mynas Care Ltd's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 July 2026.
Contact
- Address
- Unit 3, Offices 168 & 170,, Northlight House, Northlight Parade, Brierfield, Nelson, BB9 5FF Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G AFG Community West Lancashire Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- – GPAH RC NELSON Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Astra Care Services Limited Good, 0.1 miles away
- – Beyond Homecare Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
- G Homecare for you Limited Lancashire Good, 0.3 miles away