Rated Care Homes

Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 24 of 32

    rated home care services in Northumberland are rated Good, like this one.

Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside: inspection record

Home care, Northumberland

Rated Good in July 2026.

Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Aurora Home Care Ltd No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bluebird Care (Northumberland South) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Nupath Care Northumberland No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. O
    Home Instead South East Northumberland Outstanding, 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Northumberland

See all home care services in Seghill

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 July 2026 (assessment visit 28 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment was conducted remotely between 01 June to 15 June 2026. Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects services where personal care is provided this includes assistance with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where applicable, any wider social care provided is also considered. At the time of assessment, the service was supporting 21 people. This is the first rating of the service.

The provider had 2 managers registered with the Care Quality Commission, both of whom were also the providers, ensuring they were legally accountable for the operation of the service and the quality and safety of care delivered.

People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm through clear and embedded systems to identify, assess and manage risk. Safeguarding processes were well understood by staff and supported by a positive learning culture, where incidents, feedback and audits were used to continuously improve practice.

Staff were recruited safely, with appropriate checks completed prior to employment to ensure suitability for the role. Once in post, staff received a comprehensive induction, including mandatory training and a structured period of shadowing, before working independently. Ongoing training, supervision and competency assessments were in place to support staff to maintain safe and effective practice. Staff demonstrated confidence in their roles and a clear understanding of how to deliver care safely.

Care was based on comprehensive assessments and regularly reviewed to reflect people’s changing needs. Staff used their knowledge and training to monitor people’s health and wellbeing, recognising changes and responding appropriately. Where required, the service worked in partnership with healthcare professionals to ensure people received coordinated and effective care.

People were treated with kindness, compassion and respect. Staff demonstrated a strong commitment to maintaining dignity and promoting independence, supporting people to make choices and remain in control of their lives. Care was consistently person-centred, with support tailored to reflect individual preferences, routines and what mattered most to each person.

The service was responsive to people’s needs, with care adapted to reflect changes and individual circumstances. People and their families were involved in decisions about care and felt listened to. Communication systems supported continuity and ensured staff had access to up-to-date information.

Leadership within the service was supportive and visible, creating a positive working environment where staff felt valued and able to raise concerns. The provider demonstrated a commitment to supporting staff wellbeing and development, which contributed to a stable and confident workforce.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Tanya Thompson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
15341706 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Northumberland County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside.
When was Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside was published on 6 July 2026.
Who runs Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside?
Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside is run by Thompson Amour Limited.
What is Thompson Amour Limited T/A Heritage Healthcare North Tyneside's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
07983 766837
Address
Unit 25, Apex Business Village, Annitsford, Cramlington, NE23 7BF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Aurora Home Care Ltd No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bluebird Care (Northumberland South) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Nupath Care Northumberland No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. O
    Home Instead South East Northumberland Outstanding, 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Northumberland

See all home care services in Seghill