Rated Care Homes

Grace Care 24/7 Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 80

    rated home care services in East Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Grace Care 24/7 Ltd: inspection record

Home care, East Sussex

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026.

Grace Care 24/7 Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Quality healthcare Agency Limited (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Bluebird Care (Eastbourne & Wealden) (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Violets Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Grandbay Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Quality healthcare Agency Limited Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    Prestige Nursing Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in East Sussex

See all home care services in Eastbourne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 June 2026 (assessment visit 12 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The service is a domiciliary care agency providing support to adults. Not everyone being supported received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. There were 6 people who were being supported with personal care.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was the first since the service was registered in June 2024 and was undertaken between 13 March and 26 March 2026.

During this assessment we identified 3 breaches of the legal regulations. The breaches to legal regulation related to good governance and the safe recruitment and deployment of suitable skilled, competent staff.

The management roles and responsibilities had not been defined to support the effective operation of the service. There were no auditing or governance processes in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service, ensure compliance with the regulations, or to reduce risk to people. Ways of capturing feedback from people and staff had not been fully established to enable evaluation and improvement of the service. Some records were incomplete, this included care documentation and environmental risk assessments. The management team had recognised the need for improvement and provided an improvement plan to address the identified concerns identified during the assessment process.

Staff had not received appropriate training to ensure they had the skills required to meet people's needs. There was no evidence of a suitable training programme including an induction and assessment of competencies, to ensure staff had the relevant skills and experience to perform their designated roles. The recruitment process followed did not ensure a robust procedure was followed.

There was a small group of staff supporting people using the service. The staffing arrangements allowed for staff to attend to people's needs in an individual way. Feedback received confirmed staff were attentive and had time for people and their relatives. Staff responded to safeguarding issues appropriately. Staff followed good infection control practice. Medicines were not currently administered by staff; however, prescribed creams were and systems to do this safely were established during the assessment process.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff felt well supported and enjoyed their work. One said, “I like looking after X he makes me laugh.”

Staff worked closely with each other and the management team; there was a good team spirit. The management team worked with other professionals promoting good outcomes for people. People and relatives knew how to raise concerns and were confident they were acted on. People received fair and equal care and support was provided in a tailored and flexible way.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to staff training and recruitment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the quality monitoring and governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 1 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 1 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Reeja Mathew
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08131215 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Grace Care 24/7 Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Grace Care 24/7 Ltd.
When was Grace Care 24/7 Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Grace Care 24/7 Ltd was published on 1 June 2026.
Who runs Grace Care 24/7 Ltd?
Grace Care 24/7 Ltd is run by Grace Care 24/7 Ltd.
What is Grace Care 24/7 Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 1 June 2026.

Contact

Address
Suite 2 Compass House, 45 Gildredge Road, Eastbourne, BN21 4RY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Quality healthcare Agency Limited (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Bluebird Care (Eastbourne & Wealden) (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Violets Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Grandbay Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Quality healthcare Agency Limited Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    Prestige Nursing Limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in East Sussex

See all home care services in Eastbourne