Rated Care Homes

Deaconstar Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 39 of 45

    rated home care services in County Durham are rated Good, like this one.

Deaconstar Limited: inspection record

Home care, County Durham

Rated Good in December 2023.

Deaconstar Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Positive Care and Support Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. I
    Butterwick Hospice Inadequate, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Guardian Alliance Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Premier Community Care Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    RCS Domiciliary Agency Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in County Durham

See all home care services in Bishop Auckland

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 23 December 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Deaconstar Limited provides personal care and support to people living in 'supported living' settings across Bishop Auckland, so that they can live in their own home as independently as possible. The service provides support to people with a learning disability and/or autism. At the time of our inspection there were 18 people using the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's experience of the service and what we found: We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. 'Right support, right care, right culture' is the guidance CQC follows to make assessment and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

Right Support: Medicines were given safely but some systems needed review to ensure best practice was always followed. We have made a recommendation about medicines. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Some documents relating to people's mental capacity required update and the registered manager had contacted relevant parties to start this process. The service had plans and guidance to support people with identified risks. Care was person centred and promoted choice and independence. People were supported to achieve positive outcomes. People were supported by staff who received an induction and ongoing training.

Right Care: People received kind and compassionate care. Feedback from people and their relatives was all positive. Some relatives told us staffing had improved and people had more consistent staff teams. Staff knew people well, understood and responded to their individual needs. Staff promoted and respected people's right to privacy, dignity, and respect. Staff knew how to protect people from the risk of harm and abuse. People were fully supported to live a life of their choosing and to increase their independence.

Right Culture: The registered manager listened to concerns and promoted a positive culture that was person-centred, open, and inclusive. Concerns and complaints were listened and responded to. Staff were supported and given opportunities to feedback about the service. Quality assurance processes enabled continuous improvement. As the registered manager had not been in post long some systems and processes were still in development, but plans were in place and being acted on. There was a learning culture and learning was shared. There was good communication with partner agencies to support people's health and wellbeing.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection The last rating for this service was Good (published 6 March 2018).

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 23 December 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Deaconstar LtdBrand: Swanton Care and Community
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04595579 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Durham County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Deaconstar Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Deaconstar Limited.
When was Deaconstar Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Deaconstar Limited was published on 23 December 2023.
Who runs Deaconstar Limited?
Deaconstar Limited is run by Deaconstar Ltd.
What is Deaconstar Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 December 2023.

Contact

Phone
01388 663662
Address
The Old Court House, Woodhouse Lane, Bishop Auckland, DL14 6FQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Positive Care and Support Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. I
    Butterwick Hospice Inadequate, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Guardian Alliance Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Premier Community Care Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    RCS Domiciliary Agency Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in County Durham

See all home care services in Bishop Auckland