Rated Care Homes

Maisy Care at Home Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 89 of 98

    rated home care services in Wiltshire are rated Good, like this one.

Maisy Care at Home Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Wiltshire

Rated Good in July 2026.

Maisy Care at Home Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    BITAK Healthcare Ltd No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Independent Living Solutions Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Serene Healthcare Group Office Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Dohatech Healthservice Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. RI
    Maisy Care at Home Ltd Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all home care services in Wiltshire

See all home care services in Amesbury

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 July 2026 (assessment visit 6 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 3rd June 2026. Maisy Care at Home is a care at home service providing personal care for people living with dementia, people with physical disabilities, people over 65 years of age and people under 65 years of age. At the time of the assessment there were 5 people receiving a regulated activity.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it. We found the provider was working in line with this guidance.

The provider ensured people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. The provider embedded a strong, proactive safety culture that prioritised openness, transparency and continuous learning. Staff consistently demonstrated an understanding of risk management, enabling people to take positive risks while remaining safe.

People were fully involved in decisions about their safety, and care plans contained detailed risk assessments tailored to individual needs. Leaders worked collaboratively with healthcare professionals, staff and families to develop person centred support and emergency protocols. This approach empowered people to maintain independence and control over their lives.

Environmental safety was embedded into everyday practice. Staff were trained to identify hazards and escalate concerns promptly, supported by regular competency checks and scenario-based learning. Proactive referrals ensured homes were adapted to meet changing needs, enabling people to feel safe and respected in their own environment.

Staffing was safe and effective. There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people’s needs, and continuity of care was maintained. Recruitment processes were robust, and training was embedded into practice through competency observations and team meetings.

We identified some shortfalls in governance systems, particularly in relation to auditing and some oversight of concerns.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service since the location changed. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service since the location changed. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service since the location changed. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service since the location changed. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service since the location changed. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Blessing Sawadye
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12561916 (opens Companies House)

Maisy Care at Home Ltd runs 2 services, all in the South West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Maisy Care at Home Ltd

  1. RI
    Maisy Care at Home Ltd Requires improvement. Home care, Wiltshire

Getting help from Wiltshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Maisy Care at Home Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Maisy Care at Home Ltd.
When was Maisy Care at Home Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Maisy Care at Home Ltd was published on 29 July 2026.
Who runs Maisy Care at Home Ltd?
Maisy Care at Home Ltd is run by Maisy Care at Home Ltd. It runs 2 services, all in the South West.
What is Maisy Care at Home Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 July 2026.

Contact

Address
F8 Mills House, Mills Way, Boscombe Down Business Park, Amesbury, Salisbury, SP4 7RX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    BITAK Healthcare Ltd No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Independent Living Solutions Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Serene Healthcare Group Office Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Dohatech Healthservice Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. RI
    Maisy Care at Home Ltd Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all home care services in Wiltshire

See all home care services in Amesbury