Rated Care Homes

Ablewell Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 50 of 65

    rated home care services in Cheshire East are rated Good, like this one.

Ablewell Care: inspection record

Home care, Cheshire East

Rated Good in September 2018.

Ablewell Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 11 September 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This announced inspection took place on 9 and 10 August 2018 and was announced. It was the first rated inspection since the location was registered with CQC on 30 April 2015.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Ablewell Care is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people living in their own houses who misuse drugs or alcohol, who had dementia, learning difficulties or autism spectrum disorders. At the time of our inspection they were providing a service for 91 people and they had 42 care staff.

A condition of registration with CQC is for there to be a registered manager in post. There was no registered manager in post at the time of this inspection. The Nominated Individual was mentoring a manager to develop into becoming registered manager in due course.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found although there were quality assurance systems in place at the time of our inspection, further improvements were required to ensure the governance was robust. For instance, not all statutory notifications had been reported to us. The submission of a statutory notification is a legal requirement when specific incidents or events had taken place in the service.

We also found safeguarding concerns were not being tracked with an outcome or analysis for trends or themes.

There was a complaints process and procedure in place however, further improvements were needed to ensure it was clearer for people what constituted a complaint. The provider had identified this from their customer feedback survey.

A recruitment audit had been completed by the provider and seven staff recruitment files only had one reference from a previous employer. The provider had therefore, identified this and were taking action to improve this.

The governance arrangements were clear with numerous quality checks in place such as monthly auditing of daily records and medication administration sheets {MARS}, recruitment practices, analysis of incidents, customer feedback and complaints.

Safeguarding concerns were being logged and reported to the Safeguarding Authority appropriately. Staff were aware of their responsibilities and were raising concern when they suspected abuse. The provider had a whistleblowing policy in place for staff to follow.

There were enough staff to deliver care for people when they needed it. People told us if the carer was running late they would phone them to inform them. Any missed visits were investigated and the root cause identified.

Medicines were being managed safely with medication administration sheets being completed. Medication errors were being recorded and analysed. Staff were caring and were encouraging people to have as much independence as possible. People we spoke with told us they were treated with respect and dignity. People were being asked for their consent and the service was working within the Mental Capacity Act 2005 framework.

People were receiving person centred care and were being involved in their plan of care. Likes, dislikes and preferences were being recorded.

People's care needs were being assessed and the service were in the process of implementing the Herbert protocol which is good practice in identifying who may be at risk of becoming a missing person.

Healthcare professionals were being involved in people's care and staff communicated with them when needed.

The provider had implemented policies in relation to Equality and Diversity and were promoting people's rights.

The service was seeking people's views in the form of surveys and monthly reviews. A newsletter was sent out to people to inform them of anything new or changes in the service.

The provider was seeking to encourage people to work within the health and social care sector and was working on this with other outside agencies. The culture of the service was to continuously improve for the benefit of the people needing care and support.

The service offered staff a range of training which was delivered online and in the classroom. All staff were working towards the Care Certificate or had completed it. Staff were actively encouraged to complete other qualifications in care.

Supervision and appraisals were being undertaken. Staff meetings were being held and there was an "open door policy" by the managers.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask the service

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 11 September 2018. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 11 September 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07814974 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Cheshire East Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ablewell Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Ablewell Care.
When was Ablewell Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ablewell Care was published on 11 September 2018.
Who runs Ablewell Care?
Ablewell Care is run by Ablewell Limited.
What is Ablewell Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 September 2018.