Home Fairy - Derby
- Home care
- Registered since 2015
- Chaddesden, Derby, East Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2017, most recently Good in August 2026.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
60 of 67
rated home care services in Derby are rated Good, like this one.
Home Fairy - Derby: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Kitcare Supported Living Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Opportunity Knocks S & K Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Your Choice A and J Support Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Derby City Council Home First Good, 0.9 miles away
- – Courtesy Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 August 2026 (assessment visit 5 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service
Home Fairy – Derby is a domiciliary care agency (DCA) that is registered to provide personal care to people. People were supported with their personal care needs to enable them to live in their own homes and promote their independence. Not everyone who used the service received the regulated activity of personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This relates to help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where this is the case, we also consider any wider social care provided.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Who the service is for
This service supports adults who are living in their own homes, including people living with hearing loss and who use communication methods such as British Sign Language (BSL). At the time of the assessment the service supported 14 people with the regulated activity of personal care.
Key findings
We carried out this assessment between 7 and 22 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
The registered manager had created a ‘learning culture’ where staff understood the importance of reporting any concerns to help improve the service people received. For example, one staff member told us how they reported any issues and said, “[Any issues] are reviewed by the manager and they always communicate it around to the other staff, so they are aware of everything.”
Staff understood their responsibilities to help protect people from avoidable harm and abuse and knew how to report any concerns. Risk assessments were used to help identify and manage any risks associated with providing people’s care. For example, identifying any risks in people’s homes such as potential trip hazards.
The registered manager ensured there were enough staff to provide people’s care and had checked to ensure staff who had been recruited were suitable to work in care. Staff were knowledgeable on people’s areas of care and told us they completed their training regularly.
Not many people required staff to administer their medicines. However, when this was needed, staff told us how they recorded this and we reviewed records that showed this had been completed.
Staff were knowledgeable on people’s care needs however, some recent changes in one person’s care needs had not been updated in their care plan. The registered manager told us they had plans in place to ensure this would be done in a timely manner.
Staff understood the importance of checking people consented to their care and involved them in their choices. One staff member told us, “I always make sure a person is comfortable and I ask if they are okay with this before I do anything.”
Staff promoted people’s nutrition and hydration when this was needed. One staff member said, “Some people forget to drink, so we tend to put a big jug of something for the day out. We write down what they drank while we were with them, and we can look and say you’ve not had enough and encourage them to drink more.”
Staff monitored people’s health conditions effectively, for example, staff gave examples of how they monitored people’s skin to ensure it remained healthy.
Staff were mindful of respecting people’s privacy and dignity and promoting their independence. One staff member told us, “I always make sure a person is comfortable, I will ask if they are okay with this before I do it and make sure we are in a private place and no-one can walk in.”
The service provided person-centred care where people were listened to, and staff had the time to build up positive relationships with people. Staff worked to help promote people’s equal access to services. For example, one staff member told us they completed a British Sign Language (BSL) course to help them be able to communicate more effectively with a person they supported.
The service had a clear aim to provide a quality service where the minimum call time was one hour. This had helped to promote positive relationships between staff and the people they cared for.
The registered manager used spot checks and feedback from people and their relatives to help inform them on the quality and safety of their service. They responded to any issues identified and took action to make any further improvements to service.
However, some spot checks had not always been recorded, and an effective system was not in place to ensure all relevant paper records of people’s care were returned to the office. The registered manager told us they would take action to ensure improvements were made.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Deborah-Marie Foulk
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Whole Population
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 25 May 2018. Latest assessment published 2 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Home Fairy CIC
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 8904795 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Derby City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Derby City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01332 640777, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Derby City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Home Fairy - Derby provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Home Fairy - Derby.
- When was Home Fairy - Derby last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Home Fairy - Derby was published on 2 August 2026.
- Who runs Home Fairy - Derby?
- Home Fairy - Derby is run by Home Fairy CIC.
- What is Home Fairy - Derby's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 2 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 07453 990334
- Address
- 75 Copes Way, Chaddesden, Derby, DE21 4NU Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Kitcare Supported Living Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Opportunity Knocks S & K Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Your Choice A and J Support Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Derby City Council Home First Good, 0.9 miles away
- – Courtesy Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away