Rated Care Homes

Belvoir Home Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 86 of 114

    rated home care services in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Belvoir Home Care: inspection record

Home care, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in September 2026.

Belvoir Home Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Be Cared For Limited Good, 2.8 miles away
  2. G
    The Local Care Group Ltd Good, 3.1 miles away
  3. –
    Four Seasons Private Care Ltd Not yet rated, 3.2 miles away
  4. G
    Cedars Care Ltd Good, 4.3 miles away
  5. G
    Consa Ltd Good, 4.5 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 September 2026 (assessment visit 5 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

The service is a domiciliary care agency. There were 33 people using the service, however only 22 people received a regulated activity of personal care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This service supported adults of all ages, people living with dementia, physical disabilities, mental health support needs, sensory impairments or a learning disability, who were living in their own homes.

We carried out this assessment on 1 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’. This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence and access to local communities that most people take for granted. This assessment found the provider was working in line with this guidance.

We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). The manager told us they were not currently supporting anyone who had been assessed as lacking capacity; however, they were able to clearly explain the service's processes for assessing capacity and making decisions in accordance with the MCA. The manager had recently completed a Level 5 qualification in Mental Capacity Act to further develop their knowledge and understanding of MCA legislation and best practice.

People received person-centred care that was tailored to their individual needs, preferences, and wishes. Care and support were delivered flexibly and adapted as people's needs changed.

There was an effective learning culture within the service. Incidents, accidents, and complaints were appropriately recorded, investigated, and reviewed to identify opportunities for learning and drive improvements in the quality of care provided.

Staff demonstrated a clear understanding of their safeguarding responsibilities and were able to explain how they would recognise, respond to, and report concerns about abuse or neglect to help keep people safe. One staff member told us, “I know how to recognise the signs of abuse as per my training. If I needed to report it, I would contact the manager to raise my concerns.”

There were sufficient staff to ensure safe care delivery, and staff had completed a range of mandatory and role-specific training. Staff were recruited safely, and all appropriate pre-employment checks had been completed. One staff member told us, “I regularly take people out shopping, to hairdresser appointments, for coffee, and walks. All of which encourages social interaction, whether that be a chat with the cashier in the supermarket or a neighbour they pass on the street. On occasions Belvoir Home Care have ran social events for clients where they can come together to do crafts, play games, eat cake. At one such event one of our carers ran a painting session which many of the clients loved.  One client was inspired to give it a go by themself; and bought their own set of paints and thoroughly enjoyed learning a new skill.”

Medicines were managed safely. Risk assessments and care plans were in place and provided clear guidance on how to support people safely and effectively. People's environments had been risk assessed. Care plan reviews had been completed regularly to assess people's needs, monitor outcomes and identify any changes required, to ensure care remained appropriate and responsive.

People were treated equally, and barriers to accessing care and support were identified and removed, to ensure they received equitable care. For example, staff supported people to attend healthcare appointments when required, helping them to access the services they needed. One relative told us, “I am not local they [staff] will generally take [family member] to appointments particularly hospital appointments as required which is very helpful for me.”

There was a strong, shared culture, and people received care in line with the provider's values. The service had a strong management team who were knowledgeable and experienced. The manager had recently completed a Level 5 Diploma in Leadership for Health and Social Care, which had strengthened their knowledge and skills. One staff member told us, “I enjoy working for Belvoir Home Care. They [management] are very understanding of my needs as an employee, I feel like a valued member of staff, and I like their person-centred approach to care.”

A range of audits had been completed, providing managers with effective oversight and identifying concerns and risks to drive improvement. The provider demonstrated a commitment to innovation and invested in technology to support effective oversight, ensuring care delivery met people's needs and expectations. For example, staff were able to raise concerns in real time, which were immediately escalated to the management team for prompt action.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 11 December 2018. Latest assessment published 28 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Belvoir Home Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Belvoir Home Care.
When was Belvoir Home Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Belvoir Home Care was published on 28 September 2026.
Who runs Belvoir Home Care?
Belvoir Home Care is run by Ms Lorraine Durrance.
What is Belvoir Home Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01949 829307
Address
Barn 2, Shackerdale Farm, Fosse Road, Car Colston, Nottingham, NG13 8JB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Be Cared For Limited Good, 2.8 miles away
  2. G
    The Local Care Group Ltd Good, 3.1 miles away
  3. –
    Four Seasons Private Care Ltd Not yet rated, 3.2 miles away
  4. G
    Cedars Care Ltd Good, 4.3 miles away
  5. G
    Consa Ltd Good, 4.5 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire