Rated Care Homes

Primary Care Recruitment Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • The only one

    rated Requires improvement home care service in Newcastle upon Tyne, out of 37 with a rating.

Primary Care Recruitment Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Newcastle upon Tyne

Rated Requires improvement in October 2026.

Primary Care Recruitment Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Elderflower Care Services North East (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Real Life Options - Newcastle and Durham (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Elderflower Care Services North East Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Real Life Options - Newcastle and Durham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    SureCare Newcastle and North Tyneside Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Havant Care - Newcastle Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  5. O
    Home Instead Senior Care Outstanding, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Newcastle upon Tyne

See all home care services in Gosforth

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 October 2026 (assessment visit 21 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 28 July 2026 – 17 September 2026.

The service provides emergency care and support to individuals, under 18 and adults, who have complex needs and may require discharge from hospital or rehabilitation centre. At the time of the inspection, the service was providing personal care to 2 people.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This was the first inspection of the service since registering with the Care Quality Commission on 12 February 2025.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ (RSRCRC) guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

We found the provider mostly met the principles of Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture. Care plans were not always fully person-centred, as some information was not relevant to people's current care and support needs. However, there was evidence that staff used the least restrictive approaches and listened to people's preferences and choices when providing support.

We found a breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulation relating to good governance. Some care records contained missing or out-of-date information, and checks carried out by managers had not identified these concerns.

Following feedback during the assessment, the provider had begun to address some of the issues identified. The provider has also been asked to produce an action plan explaining how these issues will be addressed.

People were supported in line with their assessed needs and staff demonstrated the skills and competencies required to provide safe care. People were supported to participate in meaningful activities, maintain important relationships and access their local communities. However, care records were not always updated promptly to reflect changes in people's needs and support arrangements.

Staffing capacity was sufficient to ensure people's needs were met in a safe way, and people benefited from a consistent staff team.

Staff feedback was positive. Staff told us management were approachable and supportive, concerns were acted upon appropriately, and staffing arrangements were sufficient to meet people's needs.

Staff consistently described a person-centred culture and demonstrated an understanding of the importance of treating people with kindness, dignity and respect. They told us people were involved in decisions about their care, their preferences were respected, and their independence was promoted wherever possible.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of a legal regulation relating to governance and oversight. Governance systems had not identified the issues found during our assessment, including concerns about the accuracy and completeness of records used to support the safe management of medicines.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of a legal regulation relating to governance and oversight. Management systems and audits had not identified the issues found during our assessment, including concerns about medicines records, care plans and risk assessments.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 21 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 21 October 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Paul Burnett
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06107910 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Newcastle City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Primary Care Recruitment Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Primary Care Recruitment Ltd.
When was Primary Care Recruitment Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Primary Care Recruitment Ltd was published on 21 October 2026.
Who runs Primary Care Recruitment Ltd?
Primary Care Recruitment Ltd is run by Primary Care Recruitment Ltd.
What is Primary Care Recruitment Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 21 October 2026.

Contact

Address
The Grainger Suite, Dobson House, Regent Centre, Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 3PF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Elderflower Care Services North East (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Real Life Options - Newcastle and Durham (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Elderflower Care Services North East Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Real Life Options - Newcastle and Durham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    SureCare Newcastle and North Tyneside Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Havant Care - Newcastle Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  5. O
    Home Instead Senior Care Outstanding, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Newcastle upon Tyne

See all home care services in Gosforth