All Seasons Care Services Limited

Not everyone using All Seasons Care Services received regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care', help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Risks had been identified and assessed. There were safety measures in place to make sure people were safe. People we spoke with told us they felt safe.

Staff were recruited safely. The provider had completed the necessary recruitment checks prior to employment. There were sufficient staff to make sure people received care when they needed it. Staff told us they felt supported and they were trained in a variety of areas such as moving and handling, safeguarding and infection prevention and control. People and their relatives told us they felt staff were well trained and had the skills needed to do their jobs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the systems in the service supported this practice. The service worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).

Medicines were managed safely and staff were trained on how to administer medicines and assessed to check their competence. Records demonstrated that people had their medicines administered by staff appropriately.

Staff we spoke with were able to tell us the signs of abuse and knew how to report any concerns. They were confident the registered manager or a senior member of staff would take appropriate action.

Personal protective equipment was supplied to staff and people told us the staff wore it when supporting personal care. There were stocks of gloves, aprons and shoe covers available at the office.

People were supported to access healthcare if needed and the service supported them to call GPs, district nurses or any other healthcare professional. The service worked in partnership with other agencies to make

sure people had the support they needed at the time they needed it.

People and their relatives thought the service was caring and the staff respected their privacy and dignity. Person centred values were demonstrated by staff that told us they enjoyed the work they did. People were involved in their care and support; care plans were stored at people's own homes so they could read them at any time.

Care plans were person-centred and people told us they had been involved in their assessments of care needs. People felt listened to and were able to have a review on a regular basis. The service was in the process of transferring records from paper to an electronic system. This meant that some records had not been updated.

Confidential information was kept secure and only authorised personnel were able to access records. Staff told us about the importance of respecting people's confidentiality.

Complaints were well managed and records demonstrated all complaints were logged with the action that had been taken.

End of life care had been provided. Staff told us they enjoyed providing this type of care and had received many compliments from relatives praising their approach.

Quality monitoring was in place for a range of areas. Whilst the service had an improvement plan there was no overarching quality audit.

We have made a recommendation about quality monitoring.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found