Rated Care Homes

Creative Support – Hall Lane

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in June 2025.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 22 of 132

    rated home care services in Leeds are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Creative Support – Hall Lane: inspection record

Home care, Leeds

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025.

Creative Support – Hall Lane: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebird Care Leeds North (Good, 1.5 miles away) and St Anne's Community Services - Croft House (Good, 1.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Bluebird Care Leeds North Good, 1.5 miles away
  2. RI
    Bkind Care Ltd Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away
  3. G
  4. –
    St Anne's Leeds Domiciliary Care 3 (DCA3) No overall rating, 1.8 miles away
  5. G
    Epoch Homecare Ltd Good, 1.8 miles away

See all home care services in Leeds

See all home care services in Horsforth

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 June 2025 (assessment visit 16 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 23 April to 7 May 2025. The inspection was carried out because of the time since the last assessment and specific concerns we had received about peoples' safety, the culture and the management of risk in the service. The service is a supported living service providing personal care support to 10 people with learning disabilities across 4 houses.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed and demonstrated that people with a learning disability and autistic people are considered with respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and access to local communities that most people take for granted.

During our assessment we found 1 breach of regulation in relation to governance. We found the provider had failed to operate effective governance systems and records had not always been accurate or completed. We found improvements were required to improve the culture within the service as not all staff felt able to share their concerns. The provider was receptive to our feedback and shared how they were working towards improving the culture and governance.

We found staff were knowledgeable about people’s risks. However, records to guide staff on how to support people safely and effectively were not always in place. Systems were not always in place to ensure medicines were administered accurately and improvements were needed within records to ensure good medicines management.

The provider had liaised with external health professionals to provide joined up care and treatment for people.

Staff and management knew people well. There were sufficient staff deployed, and staff were suitably recruited and trained. Staff were seen to be kind and respectful to people.

The provider had effective systems in place to ensure people were safeguarded from potential harm and abuse. Lessons were learnt from incidents and shared with staff and across the wider company.

Staff ensured people’s consent was always received and choices given. However, we found improvements were required to ensure mental capacity assessments and best interests were recorded. People’s needs were met and adjustments made where appropriate.

The provider promoted people’s independence and staff understood the importance of supporting people to maintain their independence and making choices about their care. We observed positive interactions between staff and people using the service.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 12 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 12 June 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Katie Langton
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 24 December 2019. Latest assessment published 12 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Creative Support LimitedBrand: Creative Support Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP27440R (opens Companies House)

Creative Support Limited runs 59 services in England, 12 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 47 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 8 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Creative Support Limited

  1. O
    Creative Support - Doncaster Personalised Services Outstanding. Home care, Doncaster
  2. O
    Creative Support - Thistley Green Outstanding. Home care, Essex, East of England
  3. G
    Creative Support - 2, 3 and 4 Nightingale Close Good. Care home, Essex, East of England
  4. G
    Creative Support - Apsley Court Good. Home care, Bromley, London

See all 59 services run by Creative Support Limited

Getting help from Leeds City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Creative Support – Hall Lane provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Creative Support – Hall Lane.
When was Creative Support – Hall Lane last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Creative Support – Hall Lane was published on 12 June 2025.
Who runs Creative Support – Hall Lane?
Creative Support – Hall Lane is run by Creative Support Limited. It runs 59 services in England, 12 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Creative Support – Hall Lane's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 12 June 2025.

Contact

Address
1a Hall Lane, Cookridge, Leeds, LS16 7NJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebird Care Leeds North (Good, 1.5 miles away) and St Anne's Community Services - Croft House (Good, 1.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Bluebird Care Leeds North Good, 1.5 miles away
  2. RI
    Bkind Care Ltd Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away
  3. G
  4. –
    St Anne's Leeds Domiciliary Care 3 (DCA3) No overall rating, 1.8 miles away
  5. G
    Epoch Homecare Ltd Good, 1.8 miles away

See all home care services in Leeds

See all home care services in Horsforth