Rated Care Homes

Care 4 All Limited

Home care, Brent

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Care 4 All Limited: inspection record

Home care, Brent

Rated Requires improvement in February 2026, down from Good.

Care 4 All Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2017. Rated Good in 2017 and 2024, then Requires improvement in February 2026.

Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published 8 months ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 10 Requires improvement home care services in Brent, out of 69 with a rating.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 February 2026 (assessment visit 23 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 24 July to 2 September 2025. Care 4 All Limited is a care at home service registered to provide personal care for people living in their own homes. They are registered to provide support to people with a range of care needs, including older people, younger adults, dementia, physical disabilities, children aged 4-18 years and people who have a learning disability or autism. This is a small-sized service. At the time of our assessment, 5 service users were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

At the time of writing this report, the provider had 2 managers registered with the Care Quality Commission. During our assessment timeframe, 1 registered manager was on long-term leave. Therefore, all comments within this report relate to the registered manager who remains in post.

Read the full summary

This assessment was conducted to determine whether the service had made improvements since our last assessment. The provider had previously breached the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, as well as good governance, from their last assessment in December 2023.

During this assessment, we identified 4 breaches of the legal regulations. No improvements were found during this assessment, and the provider continued to be in breach of these regulations. Additionally, we have identified new breaches of legal regulations in relation to staffing and consent to care.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The registered manager lacked knowledge about ‘Right support, right care, right culture’, and we therefore found the principles had not been embedded into the service.

Safeguarding concerns had not always been identified or reported by the registered manager. Risks to people’s health and safety were not always adequately assessed and managed. Improvement was required in staff recruitment practices. Staff had not always received the necessary training to acquire the skills required to meet the needs and preferences of people using the service. Medicine processes were not being managed safely.

Initial assessment records completed before the commencement of care were lacking in detail. There was no evidence that health and social care professionals were also involved as partners in people’s care. Care records were not person-centred and did not provide staff with enough information to support people safely.

People were not always supported in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). There were several mental capacity assessments missing, and the service had not organised relevant best interest meetings with professionals.

Systems to review, monitor and develop the quality of the service had not improved since our last assessment. There was a lack of learning and improvement in areas highlighted within our previous assessment on 19 December 2023, despite an action plan being in place.

Governance and audit systems had not identified the issues we found during this assessment. There was a lack of oversight, monitoring and action. Several policies were in draft format and did not clearly record who the ‘policy lead’ was in place to support service delivery, thus putting people at risk of receiving poor care.

However, people were supported by a team of consistent care staff who knew them well. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service would act on the information.

The staff were kind and compassionate, promoting people’s privacy and dignity, and often worked alongside people’s relatives when providing care.

The registered manager cared about and promoted the well-being of their staff. Staff spoke positively about the support they received from the registered manager.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to staffing.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment. No improvements were identified during this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the need for consent to care.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance. No improvements were identified during this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask the service

  • Safe was rated Requires improvement on 18 February 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  • Effective was rated Requires improvement on 18 February 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  • Caring was rated Requires improvement on 18 February 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how people are involved in decisions about their care.
  • Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 18 February 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  • Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 18 February 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Contact and registration details

Details for Care 4 All Limited
Address86 Craven Park Road, London, NW10 4AE
NeighbourhoodWillesden, Brent
Phone01582 457740
Websitewww.care4alltd.com
Registered managerIsmail Hussein
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
  • Children 0-18 years
  • Dementia
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Older People
  • Physical Disability
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 1 inspection report, latest 27 July 2017 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 18 February 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Care 4 All Limited
ProviderCare 4 All Ltd
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number09833203 (opens Companies House)

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Lifelong Home Care Services Limited Home care, less than 0.1 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    Raising Care Ltd Home care, 0.1 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    Red Sea Community Programme Home care, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    MMR Homecare Ltd Home care, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  5. G Good

See all home care in Brent

Getting help from London Borough of Brent

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Care 4 All Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Care 4 All Limited.
When was Care 4 All Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Care 4 All Limited was published on 18 February 2026.
Who runs Care 4 All Limited?
Care 4 All Limited is run by Care 4 All Ltd.
What is Care 4 All Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 18 February 2026.