ICare (GB) Limited - Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre

I Care (GB) Limited also provides care and support to people living in specialist 'extra care' housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is bought or rented, and is the occupant's own home. People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people's personal care and support service.

Not everyone using I Care (GB) Limited receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care'; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

This inspection visit took place on 13 December 2018, 7 and 9 January 2019 and was announced. At the last inspection carried out on 20 and 27 April 2016 the service was rated Good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of Good. There was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the time of our inspection I Care (GB) Limited was providing a service to 262 people. This included background support and / or personal care to people who lived in one of the six extra care housing services they managed.

People said staff safely supported and cared for them or their family member. They said they were friendly and caring. One person said, "They're so very good to me. They'll do anything you ask." Another person told us, "Nothing's too much trouble for them. I'm well pleased with them."

There were procedures in place to protect people from abuse and unsafe care. Risk assessments were in place which provided guidance for staff. This minimised risks to people. Staff supported people with and managed medicines safely. People we spoke with told us staff were competent in the support they gave with medicines. One person said, "They put my creams on and write everything down so it's clear."

Care plans were in place detailing how people wished to be supported. People who received support or where appropriate, their relatives had been involved in making decisions about their care. They told us they were usually supported by the same group of staff who they knew and liked. They said their staff team were competent and caring and were familiar with their needs and preferences.

Staff told us they had enough time to care for people without rushing them. People said staff never missed turning up, usually arrived on time, stayed for the correct time allocated and did not rush them. One person told us, "They are so gentle, they make me laugh we have a chat." Other people said, "The same carers come and up to now they have been on time." And, "I'm quite happy. I have consistent carers and they are punctual with my appointment time."

Staff were recruited safely and had received training in how to care for people. One person told us, "They (staff) are well trained and know what they are doing, Staff also received regular one to one supervision and appraisal to discuss, care practice, skills and future plans. These measures gave them the skills and knowledge to provide safe and effective support.

Staff supported people to have a nutritious dietary and fluid intake which met their needs and preferences. There were safe infection control procedures and practices and staff had received infection control training. This reduced the risk of infection.

Staff understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (2005). People who received support consented to care where they were able. Where people lacked capacity, appropriate best interests' decisions were carried out.

We found the registered manager and staff team had clear lines of responsibility and accountability. They were clear about their roles and provided a well-run and consistent service. Senior staff monitored the support staff provided to people. They checked staff arrived on time and supported people in the way people wanted. The care manager monitored the service provided and informed the registered manager of any concerns.

People we spoke with knew how to raise a concern or to make a complaint. The complaints procedure was available to them and they told us any concerns were listened to and acted upon. They said they were given opportunities to give feedback about the service they received. They said they were satisfied with the care and support provided and able to discuss this with senior staff. One person said, I would say if I wasn't happy, but I've not needed to."

The service used a variety of methods to assess and monitor the quality of the service. These included regular audits and satisfaction surveys to seek their views about the service provided.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found