Rated Care Homes

Universal Care Agency Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 11 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 27

    rated home care services in Portsmouth are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Universal Care Agency Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Portsmouth

Rated Requires improvement in September 2026, down from Good.

Universal Care Agency Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Helping Hands Cosham (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Nightingales Golden Care Limited (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    We Care 24x7 Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. I
    Admiral Care Limited Inadequate, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    1 Noble Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Helping Hands Cosham Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    Magnificent Care Ltd Registered Office Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Portsmouth

See all home care services in Paulsgrove

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 September 2026 (assessment visit 7 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 8 July 2026 to 30 July 2026

We carried out this assessment to check if the provider had taken action to make the improvements we identified during our previous assessment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Universal Care Agency Ltd is a domiciliary care agency that provides care and support to people living in their own homes. CQC only inspects services where people receive the regulated activity of personal care. Personal care includes support with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where people receive wider social care support, we also consider this as part of our assessment.

The service supported older people and people living with physical disabilities, dementia and sensory impairment. Not everyone using the service received the regulated activity of personal care. At the time of this assessment, the provider supported 13 people.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to good governance. Not enough improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. ​​The provider was also in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment and fit and proper persons employed.

The provider did not operate safe recruitment practices and failed to ensure all required pre-employment checks had been completed before staff started work. People’s medicines were not always managed safely. Risk assessments lacked sufficient detail and accuracy to guide staff in keeping people safe. This included information available in people's homes relating to fire safety and pressure care risks. The provider did not operate effective quality monitoring and governance systems to identify and address shortfalls in a timely way. Ineffective oversight and governance arrangements contributed to the breaches identified during this assessment.

Leaders provided staff with support to carry out their roles. Staff told us they enjoyed working for the provider and appreciated having regular people to care for, which helped them build positive relationships and understand people's needs.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment. We will also continue to monitor improvements in governance arrangements through the provider’s monthly action plan submissions.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment as people’s risks had not always been assessed and their medicines were not always managed safely. The service was also in breach relating to fit and proper persons employed due to unsafe staff recruitment.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    The service remained in breach of legal regulations in relation to good governance.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 15 September 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 15 September 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Victor Agamasu
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

12 inspection reports, latest 11 November 2022. Latest assessment published 15 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06829827 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Portsmouth City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Universal Care Agency Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Universal Care Agency Ltd.
When was Universal Care Agency Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Universal Care Agency Ltd was published on 15 September 2026.
Who runs Universal Care Agency Ltd?
Universal Care Agency Ltd is run by Universal Care Agency Ltd.
What is Universal Care Agency Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 15 September 2026.

Contact

Address
18 Arran Close, Portsmouth, PO6 3UD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Helping Hands Cosham (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Nightingales Golden Care Limited (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    We Care 24x7 Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. I
    Admiral Care Limited Inadequate, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    1 Noble Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Helping Hands Cosham Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. –
    Magnificent Care Ltd Registered Office Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Portsmouth

See all home care services in Paulsgrove