Rated Care Homes

Outlook Care

Home care, Havering

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Outlook Care: inspection record

Home care, Havering

Rated Good in April 2020.

Outlook Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2015. Rated Good in 2015, 2017 and April 2020.

It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2015. The latest rating was published about 7 years ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 59 Good home care services in Havering, out of 66 with a rating.

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 22 April 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Outlook Care - Unit 6 Shelduck House, Billericay is a supported living service providing personal care for approximately 130 people. Support is primarily provided to people with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder.

Support is provided in approximately 20 supported living schemes based across South Essex and East London, ranging from shared houses to large complexes of individual flats, with shared communal areas. The level of support varies from minimal support to intensive 24-hour care to meet people's complex needs. Not everyone who used the service at the time of the inspection received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

At the last inspection, we rated the leadership of the service as outstanding. At this inspection, we found the leadership provided high quality management which we rated as good. People and their families gave us positive feedback about the service, and we found examples of exceptional person-centred leadership and care. However, the provider was still working towards ensuring people experienced consistently outstanding care across the service.

We were assured by the provider's commitment to promote exceptional care. In particular, we found the service was outstandingly effective, which provided a good foundation to achieve a consistent standard of care.

Read the full summary

When we last visited the service, the registered manager was implementing guidance to minimise the risk of choking. On our return we found these improvements had been sustained and represented an example of best practice, reflected in positive improvements to people's quality of life and safety. The provider had shared this learning in a positive, pro-active manner. Staff had embraced the guidance. They focused on ensuring people enjoyed what they ate and drunk, respecting their preferences and cultural needs.

Senior staff used best practice to select local staff teams who worked effectively to deliver person-centred care. Staff had varied opportunities to develop their skills, including attending training which involved the people who used the service. Staff worked well with external health professionals to enable people to develop skills so they could take control of their health needs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Technology was used creatively to minimise restrictions and improve people's quality of life.

There was a new management structure which was ensuring a more consistent quality of care. The culture

of the organisation was open. People, families and staff were encouraged to speak out and were confident they would be listened to. Comprehensive quality checks included people who used the service and highlighted areas for improvement which were acted on promptly. The provider worked well with external organisations and was committed to promoting best practice in their sector.

Risk was well managed across the service. Staff supported people to stay safe, whilst promoting their independence. Detailed risk assessments provided staff with the information about people's individual circumstances. People received the necessary support to take their medicines safely. There were enough staff to meet people's needs.

People received support from stable and caring staff teams who knew them well and treated them with respect and dignity. Staff promoted people's voice and ensured they were involved in making decisions about their care. Staff worked in an inclusive manner with people to maximise their independence.

Care and support was tailored around people's needs, adapting flexibly when their needs changed. Staff supported people to develop their interests and keep in touch with their local community, families and friends. There were arrangements in place to meet the needs of people who required end of life care. People felt able to complain if they were unhappy with the quality of care.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

Questions to ask the service

  • The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  • Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Contact and registration details

Details for Outlook Care
Address74 Neave Crescent, Harold Hill, Romford, RM3 8HN
NeighbourhoodHarold Wood, Havering
Phone01277 633163
Websitewww.outlookcare.org.uk
Registered managerPavan Hughes
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 5 inspection reports, latest 22 April 2020 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Outlook Care
ProviderOutlook CareBrand: Outlook Care
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House numberIP26988R (opens Companies House)

Outlook Care runs 6 services in London. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Outlook Care

  1. G
    Kemsing Road Respite Service Care home, Greenwich
    Good
  2. G
    Outlook Care - Dagenham Road Care home, Barking and Dagenham
    Good
  3. G
    Outlook Care - Neave Crescent Care home, Havering
    Good
  4. G
    Outlook Care - Summit Road Care home, Waltham Forest
    Good
  5. G
    Outlook Care - Veronica Close Care home, Havering
    Good

Nearest alternatives

  1. –
    CapitalPro Agency Home care, less than 0.1 miles away
    Not yet rated
  2. G Good
  3. G
    Homestead Care Service Limited Home care, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    Dedicated Life Care Home care, 0.3 miles away
    Good
  5. –
    Blessday House Home care, 0.4 miles away
    No overall rating

See all home care in Havering

Getting help from London Borough of Havering

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Outlook Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Outlook Care.
When was Outlook Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Outlook Care was published on 22 April 2020.
Who runs Outlook Care?
Outlook Care is run by Outlook Care. It runs 6 services in London.
What is Outlook Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 April 2020.