Rated Care Homes

Bradford Regional Office

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 86%

    of rated home care services in Rotherham are Good or Outstanding (90% across Yorkshire and the Humber, 88% across England).

Bradford Regional Office: inspection record

Home care, Rotherham

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Bradford Regional Office: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Care Assistance (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Voyage (DCA) Rotherham (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Rotherham Regional Office No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    We Care Rotherham Ltd (Head Office) Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Care Assistance Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. –
    Helping Hands Rotherham Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Voyage (DCA) Rotherham Good, 0.3 miles away

See all home care services in Rotherham

See all home care services in Central Rotherham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 December 2025 (assessment visit 13 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 10 to 17 November 2025. Bradford Regional Office is a supported living service, providing support and personal care to people in their own homes. Staff supported people of varying ages, and people who may have a learning disability and/or autism and people with mental health needs. At the time of our assessment 28 people were receiving support from the service, not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only assesses and inspects where people receive personal care. At the time of our assessment 10 people using the service received personal care. An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service were working within the principles of Right support, right care, right culture.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Improvements were required to ensure the management team had effective oversight of accidents and incidents, to ensure lessons were learned. This included incidents of distress, we found some records which were not robustly completed by staff, and not all incidents of distress were reviewed appropriately. We found no harm to people, and the provider had recognised this and planned to implement more robust monitoring systems, which they evidenced to us. Medicines were mostly managed safely, however some improvements were required to records, to ensure they contained enough detail, such as allergy information. Most people and relatives told us they received their medicines as prescribed, and staff completed medicines administration records (MAR’s). Staff promoted safe infection, prevention and control (IPC) practices, and regular checks were in place to ensure people’s homes were safe for use. People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse. People were supported by enough staff; all pre-employment checks were in place and staff received training to carry out their roles effectively.

People had their needs assessed and reviewed, the provider had recently introduced a new care planning software system and these included care plans and details about people’s wishes and preferences. People had positive behaviour support plans in place, which detailed potential triggers and de-escalation strategies. People received support from external professionals where required, and partners told us staff worked well with them. People had consented to their care, and where people lacked capacity, appropriate authorisations were in place about their care and support. People had regular reviews from social services, to ensure their placements were suitable and they were happy with their care and support.

Staff provided person centred support to people. Staff supported people to undertake activities and cultural experiences which were meaningful to them. People were supported to achieve their goals and have good outcomes. People were encouraged to maintain community links and maintain family relationships. People were provided with information in accessible formats and people had detailed communication plans in place, which guided staff about how to effectively communicate with each individual.

Whilst we found several auditing systems in place, some improvements were required to ensure audits identifies concerns we found in relation to monitoring accidents and incidents and medicines records. Staff felt supported in their roles. Staff told us managers were approachable and listened to them, and culture amongst the team was good. Most people and relatives told us the service was well led, and there were clear visions and values in place for the service. At the time of our assessment the local authority were working closely with the service, following some safeguarding concerns. They told us the service worked with them and improvements had been made. Some of these improvements were currently being embedded into practice.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Yvette Keenoy
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 5 September 2023. Latest assessment published 15 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04383479 (opens Companies House)

Housing And Support Solutions Limited runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Housing And Support Solutions Limited

  1. G
    Housing & Support Solutions - Bridlington Region Good. Home care, East Riding of Yorkshire
  2. G
    Housing & Support Solutions DCA Good. Home care, North East Lincolnshire
  3. G
    Housing and Support Solutions - Lincoln Good. Home care, Lincolnshire, East Midlands

Getting help from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bradford Regional Office provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Bradford Regional Office.
When was Bradford Regional Office last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bradford Regional Office was published on 15 December 2025.
Who runs Bradford Regional Office?
Bradford Regional Office is run by Housing And Support Solutions Limited. It runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Bradford Regional Office's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07342 036616
Address
228-230 Wellgate, Rotherham, S60 2PB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Care Assistance (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Voyage (DCA) Rotherham (Good, 0.3 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Rotherham Regional Office No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    We Care Rotherham Ltd (Head Office) Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Care Assistance Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. –
    Helping Hands Rotherham Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Voyage (DCA) Rotherham Good, 0.3 miles away

See all home care services in Rotherham

See all home care services in Central Rotherham