Rated Care Homes

Acqua Doria

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 166 of 205

    rated home care services in Hampshire are rated Good, like this one.

Acqua Doria: inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

Rated Good in June 2018.

Acqua Doria: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Melody Care Alton Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Altonian Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Yourlife (Alton) Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Brendoncare Mary Rose Mews Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Request Services Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Alton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 15 June 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The inspection site visit took place on 21 May 2018 and was announced to ensure staff we needed to speak with were available. This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a service to older adults, some of whom may be living with dementia, people with a physical disability and younger adults.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone using Acqua Doria receives regulated activity; the Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care'; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. On the day of the inspection, 23 people received the regulated activity.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Processes, policies and staff training were in place to keep people safe from the risk of abuse. Staff had identified and assessed a variety of potential risks to people including from their environment. Where risks were identified, action had been taken to manage them for people's safety. Staff supported people to eat and drink sufficient for their needs.

Processes were in place to investigate and learn from incidents. People were kept safe from the risks of infection. People received their medicines safely from trained and competent staff. Processes were in place to monitor if people had received their medicines as prescribed. The provider operated robust recruitment processes to ensure suitable staff were recruited. There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs and staff underwent relevant pre-employment checks to assess their suitability for their role.

People's needs had been assessed with them and their care was provided in accordance with legislation and good practice guidance. Staff received a thorough induction to their role, to enable them to provide effective care. Staff received on-going professional support in their role, through training, supervisions and professional development. Where required staff accessed additional training to ensure they could meet people's specific care needs. Staff had undertaken palliative care training, to ensure they had the knowledge and skills to support people who required end of life care.

Staff worked both together within the service and across organisations to deliver people's care and treatment. People were well supported by staff with their healthcare needs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People told us they were content and happy with the care and service they received. Staff were instructed to involve people in decisions about the delivery of their day-to-day care. People were provided with information about the service to inform their decision-making. Staff respected people and their homes and strove to uphold their independence wherever possible.

Staff understood people's individuals care needs, their preferences and what was important to them. Staff supported people to pursue their interests where commissioned to provide this type of care. The provider was in the process of introducing electronic care plans, which will increase the responsiveness of the service following changes in people's care needs. Staff worked in partnership with key organisations to ensure the effective provision of people's care.

Staff were passionate about their work and feedback from people about the quality of care provided was very positive. The service had a clear management structure and staff understood what was expected of them. People and staff were engaged and involved with the service. Staff had arranged a Royal Wedding tea party, which people enjoyed. Processes were in place to enable the provider to monitor the quality of the service provided and to identify potential areas for improvement. People were not all aware of the complaints policy, which they had been provided with, but they all felt able to raise any complaints with the office. Any complaints received had been investigated in accordance with the provider's policy.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Angela Withey
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 15 June 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04680256 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Acqua Doria provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Acqua Doria.
When was Acqua Doria last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Acqua Doria was published on 15 June 2018.
Who runs Acqua Doria?
Acqua Doria is run by Acqua Doria Limited.
What is Acqua Doria's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 June 2018.

Contact

Phone
0142085202
Address
Channing House, 14 Butts Road, Alton, GU34 1ND Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Melody Care Alton Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Altonian Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Yourlife (Alton) Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Brendoncare Mary Rose Mews Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Request Services Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Alton