Rated Care Homes

The Care Net

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 90 of 114

    rated home care services in Gloucestershire are rated Good, like this one.

The Care Net: inspection record

Home care, Gloucestershire

Rated Good in October 2026.

The Care Net: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Friends in the Community Home Nursing Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Oxford OHCI Not yet rated, 5.3 miles away
  3. –
    Trinity Carers Services Ltd Not yet rated, 5.5 miles away
  4. G
    Xperience Recruitment Limited Good, 5.5 miles away
  5. O
    Inspiratus Senior Care Limited Outstanding, 5.9 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 October 2026 (assessment visit 9 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

The Care Net is a home care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of this assessment the service was providing support to 10 people under the regulated activity of personal care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

The Care Net provides support to older and younger adults, some of whom may be living with dementia, physical disabilities and sensory impairments.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 14 to 24 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. We found that staff and leaders worked within the MCA. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions; they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. We saw communication was considered within mental capacity assessments to ensure people were able to fully participate in any decisions requiring support.

People were supported by enough staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. Staff spoke positively about the support they received from leaders, which empowered them to deliver compassionate, person-centred care and achieve exceptional outcomes for people. The service had a robust and well-planned induction programme that supported staff to develop the skills, knowledge and values needed to deliver high quality care. New staff were given time to get to know people, understand their preferences and build meaningful relationships before working independently.

Medicines were administered safely by trained and competent staff who understood people's individual needs. One staff member told us, “There are spot checks done and there is an assessor that observes us. There are medicine administration records that get reviewed and signed off.”

The provider fostered a culture where people felt safe, listened to, and supported. Open and honest communication was encouraged, respected and valued. People and staff had confidence that any concerns would be addressed promptly. Opportunities to feedback about the service and care were provided.

The service benefited from strong and effective leadership that promoted a culture of openness, learning and continuous improvement. Managers were highly visible and approachable, ensuring people, relatives and staff felt listened to and supported. Clear governance arrangements, combined with proactive oversight, enabled the service to maintain high standards of care and respond quickly to changing needs. One staff member commented, “I think it is really good company. I would recommend for anyone to work for us really. It is more on a personal level, and we can see clients that have gone from being self-sufficient to having barriers put in place by their condition and we are there to remove these barriers. It is a very rewarding job.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Karen Riggs
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 31 August 2018. Latest assessment published 13 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09627700 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Care Net provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for The Care Net.
When was The Care Net last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Care Net was published on 13 October 2026.
Who runs The Care Net?
The Care Net is run by EBridge International Ltd.
What is The Care Net's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01367 705081
Address
5 High Street, Lechlade, GL7 3AD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Friends in the Community Home Nursing Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Oxford OHCI Not yet rated, 5.3 miles away
  3. –
    Trinity Carers Services Ltd Not yet rated, 5.5 miles away
  4. G
    Xperience Recruitment Limited Good, 5.5 miles away
  5. O
    Inspiratus Senior Care Limited Outstanding, 5.9 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire