Rated Care Homes

Help at Home (Danbury Gardens)

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 71 of 89

    rated home care services in Leicester are rated Good, like this one.

Help at Home (Danbury Gardens): inspection record

Home care, Leicester

Rated Good in February 2026.

Help at Home (Danbury Gardens): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Dawn Healthcare Limited Office Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Compassionate Care For All Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    New Hope Housing and Support Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
  5. –
    Direct Care Works Ltd Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in Leicester

See all home care services in Evington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 February 2026 (assessment visit 5 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 20 – 22 January 2026.

The extra care housing complex, Danbury Gardens, is purpose built providing accommodation in a shared building. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual arrangements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people’s care and support provided by Help at Home (Danbury Gardens).

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Help at Home (Danbury Gardens) is a domiciliary care agency that provides care to some of the people who reside within the extra care housing facility. The service provides care to older people, younger adults, people living with dementia, a learning disability, mental health need, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. Not everyone who resided at Danbury Gardens received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our assessment 24 people were receiving personal care from the Help at Home service.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

A robust assessment process involved people, and where appropriate family members, along with health and social care professionals involved in their care and support. People’s expectations of their care were fully considered as part of the assessment.

Risks associated with people’s care were assessed and any decisions made as to how risks could be mitigated fully involved the person. Where people chose not to follow the guidance of external professionals their wishes were respected and their understanding as to the potential impact documented.

People were fully involved in the review of their care needs and were central to any decisions made as to any changes in their commissioned package of support and care. Staff, where required, supported people to attend medical appointments and liaised with health care professionals to promote people’s health and well-being, where assistance was requested.

There were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs. The service provided an out of hours service, with staff always being on site, enabling them to respond to emergency requests for assistance. People’s needs were met by a consistent team of staff who had undergone a safe recruitment process and were able to communicate with them in their preferred language. Training and assessment of staff competence ensured people were supported safely and effectively.

The service was led by the needs of people and provided a person-centred approach to care with the person being at the heart of all decisions. Staff always sought people’s consent prior to all care interventions. People’s care records provided a personalised account of their care and support needs, including their prescribed medicine, which was managed safely by staff when required.

Staff were supported through supervision, appraisals and meetings. Staff spoke positively of the support they received from the registered manager and of the training that enabled them to meet the individual needs of people.

Systems and processes, underpinned by policies and procedures enabled the registered manager to maintain a clear overview of the service being delivered. The provider’ continuous approach to quality monitoring, enabled the registered manager to monitor the quality and safety of the service being provided.

Partnership working with external health and social care professionals, and collaborative working with the extra care housing provider supported and enabled the service to support people to live as independently as possible.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Suby Thomas
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 31 July 2018. Latest assessment published 9 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Help At Home (Egerton Lodge) LimitedBrand: City and County Healthcare Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03035530 (opens Companies House)

Help At Home (Egerton Lodge) Limited runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Help At Home (Egerton Lodge) Limited

  1. G
    Help at Home Leicester Good. Home care, Leicestershire

Getting help from Leicester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Help at Home (Danbury Gardens) provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Help at Home (Danbury Gardens).
When was Help at Home (Danbury Gardens) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Help at Home (Danbury Gardens) was published on 9 February 2026.
Who runs Help at Home (Danbury Gardens)?
Help at Home (Danbury Gardens) is run by Help At Home (Egerton Lodge) Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is Help at Home (Danbury Gardens)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 9 February 2026.

Contact

Address
1 Danbury Place, Humberstone, Leicester, LE5 0AZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Dawn Healthcare Limited Office Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Compassionate Care For All Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    New Hope Housing and Support Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
  5. –
    Direct Care Works Ltd Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in Leicester

See all home care services in Evington