Rated Care Homes

Versita Care Ltd

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 89%

    of rated home care services in Hampshire are Good or Outstanding (87% across the South East, 88% across England).

Versita Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Versita Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES (Good, 1.4 miles away) and Helping Hands Basingstoke (Good, 1.7 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Es Care Solutions Ltd Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. –
    JRKD Care Services Limited Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
    Maycare Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  4. –
    SM Voice Advocacy Limited No overall rating, 1.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Hampshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 December 2025 (assessment visit 17 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 24 November to 05 December 2025.

Versita Care Ltd is a supported living service. Not everyone who used the supported living service was receiving the regulated activity of personal care. We only reviewed the care and support for people who were receiving the regulated activity. The service can provide support to people with a mental health condition, people with a learning disability, children aged 0-18 and adults aged under 65.

  • Effective Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out this responsive inspection of 10 quality statements from the key questions of effective, responsive and well-led. In order to check if the provider had met the requirements of the warning notice served following our inspection in January 2025 in relation to a breach of regulation 17 good governance. We also checked to see if the provider had met their action plan for the breach of regulation 11 need for consent. We found at this assessment the required improvements had been made, and the service was no longer in breach of regulations.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

People’s care needs were assessed, and their care was planned to meet their individual needs. People’s care was reviewed regularly, to ensure it remained relevant. People's consent for their care was sought and where they lacked the capacity to consent to specific decisions, legal requirements were met. Staff worked with professionals and relevant others to identify what was in people’s best interests. People were provided with relevant information about their care needs in formats which were suitable for their needs.

People received continuity of care from regular staff who had undertaken relevant training to be able to support people effectively. The provider and staff were alert to the impact of people’s previous experiences upon them and worked to provide them with equity of access and outcomes.

There were clear aims and objectives for the service which staff understood. The registered manager led the service well and processes were in place to enable people and staff to raise issues. The provider had reviewed and improved their systems for identifying, capturing and managing organisational risks and issues for people. They had processes in place to monitor the quality of the service they provided and to enable them to identify areas for improvement.

  1. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  2. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  3. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Pauline Ngole
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 10 June 2022. Latest assessment published 15 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10527984 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Versita Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Versita Care Ltd.
When was Versita Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Versita Care Ltd was published on 15 December 2025.
Who runs Versita Care Ltd?
Versita Care Ltd is run by VERSITA CARE LTD.
What is Versita Care Ltd's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07727 667369
Address
118 Roman Road, Basingstoke, RG23 8HF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: SUPPORTED LIVING ENABLEMENT SERVICES (Good, 1.4 miles away) and Helping Hands Basingstoke (Good, 1.7 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Es Care Solutions Ltd Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. –
    JRKD Care Services Limited Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
    Maycare Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  4. –
    SM Voice Advocacy Limited No overall rating, 1.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Hampshire