Rated Care Homes

Cott's Care Solutions

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 21 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 15 of 114

    rated home care services in Gloucestershire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Cott's Care Solutions: inspection record

Home care, Gloucestershire

Rated Requires improvement in January 2025, down from Good.

Cott's Care Solutions: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Retain Healthcare Limited - Cheltenham (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Helping Hands Cheltenham (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Helping Hands Cheltenham Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Farecare Gloucestershire Limited Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. O
    Saracen Care Services Ltd Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    SW Domiciliary Care Good, 0.3 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire

See all home care services in Cheltenham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 January 2025 (assessment visit 24 September 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 26 September to 16 October 2024.

This was a responsive assessment to follow up on concerns relating to the management of people’s risks and the management of staff.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People’s care requirements and risks had been assessed and information for staff was accessible on the provider’s new care management system. Staff understood people’s needs and they recorded the care they provided. Care plans were in place and gave staff guidance on how to meet people’s needs, however, staff would benefit from more detailed guidance on the management of people’s risks and the early warning signs of declining healthy. We found some inconsistencies in how people’s medicine administration records were maintained.

People told us they felt safe being supported by staff. Staff were clear about reporting any concerns to their managers, although, they were not familiar with external agencies, who also have responsibilities to safeguard people and with whom they could also report concerns to.

Staff had received the training required to carry out their role. However, safe recruitment practices were not always followed.

Effective systems were not being used to ensure the delivery of care was in line with the provider’s standards. Not all staff felt supported in their role, and some had experienced some inequalities in their support and working hours.

Prior to this assessment, the registered manager had identified and was addressing staff’s concerns about the culture of the service, communication and some of the provider’s processes.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    We identified one breach of regulations. We found the provider had not always ensured safe recruitment practices were being used.

    People’s care needs had been identified and assessed as part of their initial assessment. Staff said they generally had the necessary information to support people, however there had been instances when this information had not been readily accessible.

    People’s care plans were detailed; however, staff would benefit from more detailed guidance in the management of people’s risks and the early warning signs of a decline in people’s health.

    People told us they were administered their medicines as prescribed; however, we found staff had not fully understood how to accurately maintain people’s medicine administration records on the provider’s new electronic care management system.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    We identified one breach of regulations. We found the provider had not always operated effective governance systems to monitor the quality of people’s care and the management and recruitment of staff.

    Effective systems were not always being used to ensure staff had access to completed care records about people’s support requirements.

    The provider’s own monitoring systems had not identified inconsistencies in the recording of the administration of people’s medicines in the provider’s new electronic care management system. The provider had not ensured staff had fully understood the coding system when recording the administration of people’s medicines.

    The registered manager was reviewing the management structure and the service. They had plans in place to improve the running of the service which would have a positive impact on the people the service supported and the morale of the staff team.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Grace Rogers
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 12 December 2018. Latest assessment published 16 January 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08682774 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cott's Care Solutions provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Cott's Care Solutions.
When was Cott's Care Solutions last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cott's Care Solutions was published on 16 January 2025.
Who runs Cott's Care Solutions?
Cott's Care Solutions is run by Cott's Care Limited.
What is Cott's Care Solutions's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 16 January 2025.

Contact

Phone
01242 371048
Address
3 Royal Crescent, Cheltenham, GL50 3DA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Retain Healthcare Limited - Cheltenham (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Helping Hands Cheltenham (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Helping Hands Cheltenham Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Farecare Gloucestershire Limited Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. O
    Saracen Care Services Ltd Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    SW Domiciliary Care Good, 0.3 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire

See all home care services in Cheltenham