Mulberry Home Care Services Limited
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2018
- Weybridge, Surrey, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.
1 month
since the latest rating was published.
177 of 209
rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.
Mulberry Home Care Services Limited: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Domicare Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Yourlife (Weybridge) Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Austin Place Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Hartwig Care (Weybridge) Good, 0.6 miles away
- O Atkins Care Services Limited Outstanding, 1.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 September 2026 (assessment visit 25 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service
Mulberry Home Care Services Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care and support to people living in their own homes. The service was supporting 27 people with the regulated activity of personal care at the time of this assessment.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Who the service is for
This service supports older people, some of whom are living with dementia, and people with physical disabilities who are living in their own homes.
Key findings
We carried out this assessment on 24 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
Staff were aware of risks to people’s safety and knew how to raise concerns. However, we found risk management plans did not always contain sufficient guidance for staff. This concern was largely mitigated by people having consistent staff supporting them who had received training in all the areas of concern identified. The provider told us they would review risk management records and make the required changes.
Staff understood their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding people from abuse and the provider had effective systems in place to monitor, report and address concerns. When accidents or incidents occurred, the provider took action to ensure people’s safety and put measures in place to minimise risks to people going forward. Robust systems were in place to manage people’s medicines and staff followed safe infection prevention and control procedures. The provider supported people to assess the safety of the environment and made referrals to external agencies offering advice on fire safety and security.
Staff were recruited safely and received a broad range of training to support them in their roles. They told us they felt fully supported by the provider and registered manager and were able to contact them for advice at any time. One staff member told us, “If you need them, they are there at the end of the phone. You only have to ask. It makes such a big difference and makes you feel so much more comfortable and confident.”
People’s needs were assessed prior to them receiving care. Regular reviews were held to ensure there were no changes to people’s care needs and that they were happy with the support they received. The service worked well with a range of healthcare professionals to ensure people’s health outcomes were closely monitored and improved. Professionals told us the service communicated with them regularly and made appropriate referrals to support people’s safety and health needs.
People and their relatives told us they were supported by kind and caring staff who knew them well. One person told us, “I really can't fault them; they're all lovely, really lovely. They’re kind and friendly and very helpful, they'll turn their hands to anything. I really like them; they couldn't be more respectful.” Staff were able to describe how they ensured they gained people’s consent and understood the importance of providing people with choice. One staff member told us, “We always offer a choice and ask what they are happy with. Some people have very set ways in they want things to be done and we must respect that. It’s their independence and choice.”
People and their relatives told us they felt able to contact the office should they need any changes or to raise any concerns. We heard a number of telephone conversations during our inspection visit where the management team responded to people warmly and gave assurances that changes to the timings of visits or additional support would be actioned.
The provider had robust systems in place to review the safety and effectiveness of the service people received. Frequent checks of people’s care were undertaken and records were reviewed regularly. Any shortfalls were addressed promptly and action taken to prevent them reoccurring.
People’s care was planned in a person-centred way, at a time of their choosing and using a consistent staff team. The provider and registered manager told us the aim of the organisation was to provide people with safe and highly personalised care. This was reflected in the comments received from people, relatives and staff. One relative told us, “All I can say is that they're amazing, life supportingly good, they know [family member] every which way. They're forever going above and beyond and often going the extra mile.”
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Mercedes Mckay
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 30 March 2019. Latest assessment published 8 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 10929191 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Surrey County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Surrey County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 200 1005, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Surrey County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Mulberry Home Care Services Limited provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Mulberry Home Care Services Limited.
- When was Mulberry Home Care Services Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Mulberry Home Care Services Limited was published on 8 September 2026.
- Who runs Mulberry Home Care Services Limited?
- Mulberry Home Care Services Limited is run by Mulberry Home Care Services Limited.
- What is Mulberry Home Care Services Limited's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 September 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 07518 063018
- Address
- Unit 4, 51 St. Marys Road, Weybridge, KT13 9PX Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Domicare Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Yourlife (Weybridge) Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Austin Place Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Hartwig Care (Weybridge) Good, 0.6 miles away
- O Atkins Care Services Limited Outstanding, 1.3 miles away