Rated Care Homes

Help at Home Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 20 of 26

    rated home care services in North Tyneside are rated Good, like this one.

Help at Home Care: inspection record

Home care, North Tyneside

Rated Good in June 2026.

Help at Home Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Breeze Support Solutions No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    Equal Partnerships Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Flexible Support Options Ltd, Shiremoor Farm House No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Everlasting Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in North Tyneside

See all home care services in New York

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 June 2026 (assessment visit 2 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment was conducted remotely from 1 May to 16 May 2026. Help at Home Care is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of assessment, the service was supporting 21 people. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects services where personal care is provided this includes assistance with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where applicable, any wider social care provided is also considered.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of our assessment, the service was supporting people who lived with dementia and people with physical disabilities.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

The provider demonstrated a strong, proactive approach to delivering safe and effective care, underpinned by robust systems, continuous learning, and a culture of openness and accountability. Clear processes were in place to manage incidents, complaints, safeguarding, and risk, with learning embedded into practice and shared across the staff team. Care was well planned and regularly reviewed, ensuring it remained responsive to people’s changing needs. There was effective partnership working which supported continuity and coordinated care.

Staffing arrangements were safe and well managed, with appropriate recruitment, training, supervision, and oversight systems in place.

Care was consistently person-centred, with people actively involved in decisions about their care and supported to maintain independence, choice, and control. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of individual needs and delivered tailored care that respected people’s preferences, backgrounds, and rights. The provider promoted inclusion and accessibility, ensuring information and care approaches met diverse needs, while supporting people to engage in their communities and maintain relationships.

Leadership was effective and inclusive, fostering a positive culture where staff felt supported, valued, and able to raise concerns. There was a clear commitment to equality, diversity, continuous improvement, and future planning, ensuring care remained high quality and responsive.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Fabion Wasarirevu
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 11 October 2019. Latest assessment published 15 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11243029 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from North Tyneside Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Help at Home Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Help at Home Care.
When was Help at Home Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Help at Home Care was published on 15 June 2026.
Who runs Help at Home Care?
Help at Home Care is run by Help @ Home Care Limited.
What is Help at Home Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 June 2026.

Contact

Address
Colbat Business Exchange, Cobalt Business Centre, Cobalt Park Way, Wallsend, NE28 9NZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Breeze Support Solutions No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    Equal Partnerships Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Flexible Support Options Ltd, Shiremoor Farm House No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Everlasting Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in North Tyneside

See all home care services in New York