Rated Care Homes

Woodhall Support Services Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 34

    rated home care services in Telford and Wrekin are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Woodhall Support Services Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Telford and Wrekin

Rated Requires improvement in March 2026, down from Good.

Woodhall Support Services Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Phoenix Care (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Sanctuary Supported Living (Oleander House) (Good, 1.9 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Brown Clee Care Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Phoenix Care Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Firstcall 247 Limited (Telford) Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Dailycare4U Telford Ltd Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  5. –
    Waterwell Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Telford and Wrekin

See all home care services in Wellington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 March 2026 (assessment visit 12 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 28 November 2025, 14, 15 and 16 January 2026. Woodhall Support Services Ltd is a domiciliary care service that provides care and support to people living in their own home.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

During this assessment, we reviewed the quality statements Safe and Well-Led. We found the registered provider was in breach of 2 regulations relating to safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment and good governance.

Discussions with the registered manager, alongside a review of records, confirmed potential safeguarding concerns had not been referred to the appropriate agencies to ensure people’s safety.

Care records did not contain the necessary information to support staff understanding about how to provide appropriate care. For example, dementia and oral care plans were not in place. Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) were missing, which meant there was no clear guidance to ensure safe evacuation in the event of an emergency. In addition, for medicines prescribed as Pro Re Nata (PRN), there were no protocols in place to support the safe and consistent administration of these medicines.

A review of the provider’s governance arrangements was required to ensure effective oversight of the service and to address the shortfalls identified during this assessment.

Risk assessments were in place to promote people’s independence whilst ensuring their safety. Incidents had not been referred to the appropriate agencies. Action had been taken by the registered manager to reduce the risk of further recurrence.

At the time of our assessment, the service was providing care to people with a learning disability and autistic people. However, the registered provider was not registered for this service user band. Although, staff had received training within this area. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Since the site visit, we have received an application to add the service user band for learning disability and autism and an updated Statement of Purpose.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained as requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 March 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 March 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Amey Khafif
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 21 April 2020. Latest assessment published 25 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11647296 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Telford & Wrekin Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Woodhall Support Services Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Woodhall Support Services Ltd.
When was Woodhall Support Services Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Woodhall Support Services Ltd was published on 25 March 2026.
Who runs Woodhall Support Services Ltd?
Woodhall Support Services Ltd is run by Woodhall Support Services Ltd.
What is Woodhall Support Services Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01952 373000
Address
2 Haygate Road, Wellington, Telford, TF1 1QA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Phoenix Care (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Sanctuary Supported Living (Oleander House) (Good, 1.9 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Brown Clee Care Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Phoenix Care Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Firstcall 247 Limited (Telford) Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Dailycare4U Telford Ltd Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  5. –
    Waterwell Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Telford and Wrekin

See all home care services in Wellington